effectiveness between lidocain and meperidin in anal fissure

Phase 3

• Conditions: chronic anal fissure.; Chronic anal fissure; K60.1

• Registration Number: IRCT20180921041078N1
• Lead Sponsor: Esfahan University of Medical Sciences

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Last Update Posted: 5 January 2021

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Complete
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 120

Inclusion Criteria

all patients with anal fissure

Exclusion Criteria

Patient dissatisfaction with spinal anesthesia
infection site of spinal anesthesia
coagolopathy

Study & Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Sphincter tone in spinal anesthesia with meperidine compared to spinal anesthesia with lidocaine. Timepoint: During the anal fissure surgery. Method of measurement: Anal manometry.;Comparison of mean pain score in 2 hours. 4, 6, 12 and 24 after surgery based on NSR questionnaire in spinal anesthesia with lidocaine and meperidine. Timepoint: after surgery. Method of measurement: NSR questionnaire.;Comparison of the frequency distribution of lidocaine-induced complications with meperidine-induced complications during and after surgery in two methods of spinal anesthesia with lidocaine and spinal anesthesia with meperidine. Timepoint: During and after surgery. Method of measurement: NSR questionnaire.