Comparison of De-Epithelialized Gingival Graft With or Without Platelet Rich Fibrin in Multiple Gingival Recessions
- Conditions
- Gingival Recession, Generalized
- Interventions
- Procedure: DGG+PRFProcedure: DGG
- Registration Number
- NCT06509867
- Lead Sponsor
- Kutahya Health Sciences University
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy and patient reported outcome measures of de-epithelialized gingival graft (DGG) with or without platelet rich fibrin on treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions with coronally advanced flap (CAF) technique.
- Detailed Description
Fifteen patients with split-mouth multiple gingival recessions affecting at least 3 adjacent teeth will be treated with either DGG or DGG+PRF. Recession depth(RD) and width(RW), probing depth(PD), clinical attachment level(CAL), keratinized tissue width (KTW), gingival thickness(GT), and percentage of root coverage (RC%) will be evaluated at 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. For patient reported outcome measurements, oral health impact factor-14 (OHIP-14) scores, postoperative pain, bleeding, discomfort and painkiller consumption will be recorded.
A total of 15 patients will surgically treated with coronally advanced flap (CAF) associated with de-epithelialized gingival graft. Groups were defined as DGG and DGG+PRF:
DGG Group (n=15): de-epithelialized subepithelial connective tissue grafts + coronally advanced flap DGG+PRF Group (n=15): de-epithelialized subepithelial connective tissue grafts+ L-Platelet Rich Fibrin + Coronally advanced flap
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 15
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Platelet rich fibrin DGG+PRF de-epithelialized subepithelial gingival grafts+ L-Platelet Rich Fibrin + Coronally advanced flap de-epithelialized gingival grafts DGG de-epithelialized gingival grafts + coronally advanced flap
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method percentage of root coverage at 6th month Percentage of Root Coverage (RC%) were performed with the following formulas. RC%: \[(Preoperative RD-Postoperative RD)/ Preoperative RD\] x 100.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Gazi University Faculty of Dentistry
🇹🇷Ankara, Turkey