MedPath

Comparison of De-Epithelialized Gingival Graft With or Without Platelet Rich Fibrin in Multiple Gingival Recessions

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Gingival Recession, Generalized
Interventions
Procedure: DGG+PRF
Procedure: DGG
Registration Number
NCT06509867
Lead Sponsor
Kutahya Health Sciences University
Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy and patient reported outcome measures of de-epithelialized gingival graft (DGG) with or without platelet rich fibrin on treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions with coronally advanced flap (CAF) technique.

Detailed Description

Fifteen patients with split-mouth multiple gingival recessions affecting at least 3 adjacent teeth will be treated with either DGG or DGG+PRF. Recession depth(RD) and width(RW), probing depth(PD), clinical attachment level(CAL), keratinized tissue width (KTW), gingival thickness(GT), and percentage of root coverage (RC%) will be evaluated at 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. For patient reported outcome measurements, oral health impact factor-14 (OHIP-14) scores, postoperative pain, bleeding, discomfort and painkiller consumption will be recorded.

A total of 15 patients will surgically treated with coronally advanced flap (CAF) associated with de-epithelialized gingival graft. Groups were defined as DGG and DGG+PRF:

DGG Group (n=15): de-epithelialized subepithelial connective tissue grafts + coronally advanced flap DGG+PRF Group (n=15): de-epithelialized subepithelial connective tissue grafts+ L-Platelet Rich Fibrin + Coronally advanced flap

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
15
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Platelet rich fibrinDGG+PRFde-epithelialized subepithelial gingival grafts+ L-Platelet Rich Fibrin + Coronally advanced flap
de-epithelialized gingival graftsDGGde-epithelialized gingival grafts + coronally advanced flap
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
percentage of root coverageat 6th month

Percentage of Root Coverage (RC%) were performed with the following formulas. RC%: \[(Preoperative RD-Postoperative RD)/ Preoperative RD\] x 100.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Gazi University Faculty of Dentistry

🇹🇷

Ankara, Turkey

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath