Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in Medium to Large Rotator Cuff Tears
- Conditions
- Rotator Cuff Tear
- Interventions
- Procedure: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with PRPProcedure: Conventional arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
- Registration Number
- NCT01458665
- Lead Sponsor
- Seoul National University Hospital
- Brief Summary
* The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and anatomical outcomes of rotator cuff repair with Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and conventional rotator cuff repair in treatment of medium to large rotator cuff tears.
* PRP application to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair would accelerate recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in terms of pain relief, functional outcomes, overall satisfaction, and enhance structural integrity of repaired tendon.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 74
medium to large rotator cuff tear as a determined by clinical examination and MR prior to surgery.
- previous history of shoulder surgery
- acute trauma
- chronic dislocation
- pyogenic infection
- rotator cuff arthropathy with glenohumeral osteoarthritis and superior migration of the humeral head
- showed abnormal serological test results
- thrombocytopenia (platelets less than 15000 per microliter)
- had been received anti-platelet medication
- psychiatric problems that precludes informed consent or inability to read or write
- other serious problems that preclude participation of the study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description PRP group Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with PRP - Conventional group Conventional arthroscopic rotator cuff repair -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Constant-Murley shoulder score Postoperative 3months The Constant score assesses pain, function, ROM, and strength. Pain is allotted a maximum of 15 points, activities of daily living (function)20 points, ROM 40 points, and strength 25 points. The component scores are summated to achieve a maximum possible total score of 100.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Joint & Spine Center, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of