跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2014/09/004985
CTRI/2014/09/004985已完成未知

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF COMMERCIAL PROLENE MESH VERSUS POLYESTER NET MESH FOR TENSION-FREE INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR

Department of General Surgery0 个研究点目标入组 170 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
未知
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
170

研究概览

简要总结

暂无简介。

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional

入排标准

入选标准

  • 1. Patients included were 14 years of age or older, irrespective of sex, seen at the Department of Surgery, SMS Hospital.
  • 2. All these patients had diagnosis of inguinal hernia confirmed during surgery irrespective of type.
  • 3. Patients under ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) ASA grade 1 â?? normal healthy person or ASA grade 2 â?? patient with mild systemic illness.
  • 4. Patients giving consent to undergo inguinal hernia surgery using either of the mesh.

排除标准

  • 1. Patients presenting with recurrent hernia irrespective of the type of repair done previously.
  • 2. Patients presenting with features suggestive of strangulated or obstructed hernia.
  • 3. HIV positive and other immunocompromised (cancer pt., pt. on steroids, pt. on chemotherapy) patients.
  • 4. Patients under ASA grade 3 or above.
  • 5. Patients not giving consent to be part of the study.
  • 6. Patients suffering from hemorrhagic tendency.

研究者

发起方
Department of General Surgery

相似试验