Dynamic Guided Implant Surgery VS Static Guided Surgery.
- Conditions
- Bone Crest of at Least 10 mm Length and 6 mm WidthPartially Edentulous PatientsPatients of at Least 18 Years Old
- Interventions
- Device: Dental implant placementProcedure: Static guided implant placement
- Registration Number
- NCT06417788
- Lead Sponsor
- Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
- Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate if dynamic-guided surgery is an accurate system for placing dental implants.
Researchers will assess the dental implant accuracy of the dynamic guided system compared to the static pilot guide.
Participants will:
* Receive implant treatment that will be placed by a dynamic or static pilot drill guided system.
* Receive post-operative radiological exam for comparative (on the same appointment).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 10
- 18 years or older,
- ASA type 1 or 2,
- Full mouth plaque scores up to 25% (O'LEARY TJ. The plaque control record 1972;43:38), -Partially edentulous with at least one missing tooth
- Having a bone crest of at least 10mm in length and 6mm in width.
- medical conditions contraindicating surgery,
- untreated periodontal disease or caries
- the need for bone augmentation
- acute local infections
- history of head/neck radiation.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Test group or Dynamic guided group Dental implant placement in this arm, the position and angulation of the implant in the patient's mouth will be guided by a dynamic guided system. Control group or Static guided group Static guided implant placement In this arm, the position and angulation of the implant in the patient's mouth will be guided by a stereolitographic pilot drill guide.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Implant placement accuracy at the vertical plane. The data for the assessment is collected during the same appointment as the implant placement and requires an additional 20 minutes. Implant placement accuracy compared with the implant planning. Expressed in mm.
Implant placement accuracy at the implant platform level The data for the assessment is collected during the same appointment as the implant placement and requires an additional 20 minutes. Implant placement accuracy compared with the implant planning. Expressed in mm.
Implant placement accuracy at the implant apex level The data for the assessment is collected during the same appointment as the implant placement and requires an additional 20 minutes. Implant placement accuracy compared with the implant planning. Expressed in mm.
Implant placement accuracy at an angular evel The data for the assessment is collected during the same appointment as the implant placement and requires an additional 20 minutes. Implant placement accuracy compared with the implant planning. Expressed in degrees.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
🇪🇸Sant Cugat Del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain