A Comparative Study For Assessing The Efficacy Of Implant Placement With Two Different Systems.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: K068- Other specified disorders of gingiva and edentulous alveolar ridge
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/09/046095
- Lead Sponsor
- Bhavya Manchala
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Edentulous mandibular posterior sites
Exclusion Criteria
1. Patients with uncontrolled systemic diseases
2. Pregnancy or lactating women
3. Chronic smokers
4. Patients with infectious diseases (HIV, Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C )
5. Known allergy to any component of the implant or implant guide
6. Patients undergoing radiation therapy
7. Patients under bisphosphonate therapy
8. INR >2.5
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What are the molecular mechanisms underlying static guided implant placement in K068-related gingival disorders?
How does dynamic navigation system compare to standard-of-care for edentulous alveolar ridge treatment outcomes?
Which biomarkers correlate with successful implant integration in static versus dynamic navigation approaches?
What adverse events are associated with static guided versus dynamic navigation implant techniques?
Are there combination therapies that enhance implant success in patients with Other specified disorders of gingiva?