Comparison between two supraglottic devices in gynaecological surgeries
Phase 4
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: null- In Patients undergoing elective gynecological surgeries
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2018/03/012563
- Lead Sponsor
- Sir Ganga Ram Hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 30
Inclusion Criteria
1.ASA physical status I-III
2.Age >= 18 years
3.Fasting more than 6 hours
4.BMI <= 35 kg/m2
5.Surgery duration < 2 hours
Exclusion Criteria
1.Refusal to consent
2.Patients with anticipated difficult airway
3.Risk of aspiration of gastric contents (Pregnancy, full stomach, hiatus hernia)
4.Surgery requiring tracheal intubation
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare oropharyngeal seal pressure of the two devicesTimepoint: postinduction, after recovery and 4 hours after anaesthesia recovery
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.Insertion time <br/ ><br>2.Rate of first time successful placement of the devices <br/ ><br>3.Number of attempts for insertion of device <br/ ><br>4.Ease of insertion <br/ ><br>5.Pharyngolaryngeal morbidity <br/ ><br>6.Other adverse effects like dysphagia, sore throat <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 1.At the time of insertion <br/ ><br>2.At the end of surgery <br/ ><br>3.30 minutes post operative <br/ ><br>4.Four hours post opertaive