Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05854953
NCT05854953RecruitingNot Applicable

A Randomised Crossover Clinical Trial to Compare the Effects of Different Storage Conditions on Removable Retainers

University of Malaya1 site in 1 country24 target enrollmentStarted: May 10, 2023Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Recruiting
Enrollment
24
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Microbial colony counts of removable retainers in wet and dry storage conditions

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Orthodontic removable retainers are appliances that hold the position of the upper and lower teeth after fixed braces treatment and they can be removed from a patient's mouth. Basically, there are 2 types of removable retainers; Hawley retainer and vacuum-formed retainer.

Hawley retainer is made of an acrylic resin plate that covers the palate for the upper jaw and the back of the arch facing the tongue for the lower jaw. It has thin stainless-steel wires incorporated to fit the first molars and the six front teeth as retention.

Vacuum-formed retainer (VFR) is a clear or transparent plastic retainer. It covers the teeth completely and a small part of the gum.

The investigators' interest is to determine whether the storage conditions will affect the amount of bacteria, appearance and strength of removable retainers. Primarily, the amount of bacteria that sticks to the retainers may cause overall dental and oral health effects such as mouth odour, dental caries and gum problems. The investigators would also like to assess the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of participants after storing retainers in different storage conditions by answering a questionnaire.

Detailed Description

RATIONALE OF THE STUDY

A non-bias clinical study is required to facilitate the best recommendation to care for the orthodontic retainers. This may prevent the risk of further harms to the oral condition and increase the longevity of the retainers. In turn, this would improve the OHRQoL of orthodontic patients and potentially save the cost of retainer replacements. Therefore, the findings may help to provide evidence-based guidelines for the storage method of removable retainers.

Primary Objective

  1. To compare the microbial colony counts of removable retainers in wet and dry storage conditions.

Secondary Objectives 2. To compare the surface roughness of removable retainer materials in wet and dry storage conditions. 3. To compare the colour stability of removable retainer materials in wet and dry storage conditions. 4. To compare the compressive strength of removable retainer materials in wet and dry storage conditions. 5. To evaluate OHRQoL of participants storing their removable retainers in dry and wet conditions.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Crossover
Primary Purpose
Screening
Masking
Single (Investigator)

Masking Description

Investigator will be masked with the randomization sequance & allocation.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients aged 18 years and above
  • •Fixed appliance treatment on both the upper and lower arches
  • •Ready for debond
  • •Planned for either Hawley retainers or VFRs for retention
  • •Fit and healthy patients without systemic disease
  • •Non-smoking patients

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Sectional fixed appliance treatment or fixed appliance treatment on single arch only
  • •Planned for double retention with bonded retainers
  • •Systemic disease that may affect salivary flow
  • •Smoking patients

Arms & Interventions

Hawley retainers in dry storage condition

Experimental

Acrylic retainers to be stored in a dry retainer box the entire time when not in use.

Intervention: Hawley retainers in dry storage condition (Device)

Hawley retainers in wet storage condition

Experimental

Acrylic retainers to be stored in a glass of clean tap water the entire time when not in use.

Intervention: Hawley retainers in wet storage condition (Device)

Vacuum-formed retainers in dry storage condition

Experimental

Thermoplastic retainers to be stored in a dry retainer box the entire time when not in use.

Intervention: VFRs in dry storage condition (Device)

Vacuum-formed retainers in wet storage condition

Experimental

Thermoplastic retainers to be stored in a glass of clean tap water the entire time when not in use.

Intervention: VFRs in wet storage condition (Device)

Baseline characteristics

Active Comparator

Newly constructed Hawley retainers and VFRs will be labeled as baseline samples.

Intervention: Baseline characteristics (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Microbial colony counts of removable retainers in wet and dry storage conditions

Time Frame: 6 months

Removable retainers will be sonicated and vortexed to dislodge bacteria. Serial dilution will be done and bacterial suspension will be pipetted on a BHI agar petri dish. Total bacterial count in CFU/ml will be counted at baseline, T1 and T2.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Surface roughness of removable retainers in wet and dry storage conditions(6 months)
  • OHRQoL of participants storing their removable retainers in dry and wet conditions(6 months)
  • Colour stability of removable retainers in wet and dry storage conditions(6 months)
  • Compressive strength of removable retainers in wet and dry storage conditions(6 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Dr Wan Nurazreena Wan Hassan

Associate Professor, Department of Paediatric Dentistry & Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry

University of Malaya

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials