Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03172442
NCT03172442CompletedNot Applicable

Dentoskeletal Effects of The Orthodontic Removable Traction Appliance in The Treatment of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Damascus University1 site in 1 country22 target enrollmentStarted: May 1, 2017Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
22
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
The change of the ANB angle

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This experimental study aims to evaluate the efficiency of the orthodontic removable traction appliance in the treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion. The study sample will consist of 44 patients with skeletal class III malocclusion. The sample will be allocated randomly into two groups: experimental group and control group. The dentoskeletal changes will be assessed by using lateral cephalometric radiographs before treatment and after obtaining 3mm positive overjet.

Detailed Description

Treatment of class III malocclusion is a major challenge in orthodontic contemporary practice, Several appliance have suggested for the treatment of class III malocclusion, such as the facial mask and chin cup.

Despite of the efficiency of this extraoral appliance, its external appearance and its big size reduce patients' cooperation which decrease its clinical effects.

Another Class III treatment modality is the Orthodontic Removable Traction Appliance (ORTA). It is a removable appliance that can be used in conjunction with rapid palatal expansion or fixed appliances, It was developed in the 1980's by Dr. David Musich who developed this appliance in order to overcome issues of compliance that Dr. Musich experienced with use of the protraction facemask.

There is only one study that evaluated this appliance which is a retrospective study compared the treatment effects of the ORTA and protraction facemask in treatment of Class III malocclusions. However, this study has a lot of limitations which made it difficult to accurately evaluate the efficiency of this device.

The aim of this study is studying the dentoskeletal changes that result from treatment by this device, by comparing them to the changes in matched untreated group,by studying the cephalometric x-rays.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Masking Description

No masking could be applied

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
8 Years to 10 Years (Child)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients in early mixed dentation (8-10 years old).
  • •Skeletal class III caused by maxillary deficiency with or without mandibular prognathism judged clinically and confirmed radiographically(ANB≤1).
  • •Anterior crossbite on two teeth or more or an edge-to-edge bite.
  • •Normal inclination of the lower incisors with the mandibular plane.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Poor oral hygiene.
  • •Previous orthodontic treatment.
  • •Patients with syndromes, clefts, or craniofacial abnormalities.
  • •Severe skeletal class III primarily resulting from mandibular prognathism (ANB less than - 4)
  • •Patients with facial asymmetry.
  • •Patients with vertical growth pattern.

Arms & Interventions

Control group

No Intervention

without intervention

orthodontic removable traction appliance

Experimental

Patients in this group will be treated using the orthodontic removable traction appliance (vacuum plate with two hooks between lateral incisor and canine in each side). An rapid maxillary expander will be applied to disarticulate maxillary sutures to allow more efficient forward protraction of the maxilla.

Class III elastic traction from upper first molar to the hook in both side. This appliance will be used full-time with Class III elastics (6- to 8-ounce) traction.

Intervention: Vacuum plate (Device)

orthodontic removable traction appliance

Experimental

Patients in this group will be treated using the orthodontic removable traction appliance (vacuum plate with two hooks between lateral incisor and canine in each side). An rapid maxillary expander will be applied to disarticulate maxillary sutures to allow more efficient forward protraction of the maxilla.

Class III elastic traction from upper first molar to the hook in both side. This appliance will be used full-time with Class III elastics (6- to 8-ounce) traction.

Intervention: Rapid maxillary expander (Device)

orthodontic removable traction appliance

Experimental

Patients in this group will be treated using the orthodontic removable traction appliance (vacuum plate with two hooks between lateral incisor and canine in each side). An rapid maxillary expander will be applied to disarticulate maxillary sutures to allow more efficient forward protraction of the maxilla.

Class III elastic traction from upper first molar to the hook in both side. This appliance will be used full-time with Class III elastics (6- to 8-ounce) traction.

Intervention: Class III elastics (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

The change of the ANB angle

Time Frame: Assessment will be done before treatment (T0) and after obtaining 3-mm positive overjet which will be approximately obtained after 6 months (T1).

The change of the ANB angle before and after using the Orthodontic Removable Traction Appliance compared with this of the control group will be evaluated using lateral cephalometric radiographs.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Levels of discomfort(A questionnaire will be given to the patients four times during treatment; after 1day, after 1 week, after 1 month and after 3 months of the application of the appliance.)
  • The change of the SNA angle(Assessment will be done before treatment (T0) and after obtaining 3-mm positive overjet which will be approximately obtained after 6 months (T1).)
  • The change of the SNB angle(Assessment will be done before treatment (T0) and after obtaining 3-mm positive overjet which will be approximately obtained after 6 months (T1).)
  • Levels of acceptance(A questionnaire will be given to the patients four times during treatment; after 1day, after 1 week, after 1 month and after 3 months of the application of the appliance.)
  • Levels of pain(A questionnaire will be given to the patients four times during treatment; after 1day, after 1 week, after 1 month and after 3 months of the application of the appliance.)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials