跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02419014
NCT02419014已完成不适用

Cranial Electrotherapy for Military Beneficiaries With Restless Legs Syndrome

Tripler Army Medical Center2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 48 人开始时间: 2014年2月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
48
试验地点
2
主要终点
Change in International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) from baseline and weekly for 8 weeks post intervention

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of Cranial Electrical Stimulation (CES) therapy in treating symptoms of Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS). Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups, a usual care (control group), an active CES device group and a sham (inactive) CES device group. Those who are enrolled in one of the device groups will not know which type of device they have (blinding). Those enrolled in the usual care group and sham groups will ultimately have the option to use the active device after they complete the study. Study length for participants is 8 weeks.

详细描述

Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) is a chronic neurologic disease that causes painful and distressing dysesthesias in the lower extremities at night affecting sleep quality and greatly influencing general overall health. Leading theories as to the cause of RLS symptoms point to a deficiency of central nervous system dopamine levels. Cranial Electrical Stimulation (CES) is a therapy that has been shown to affect activity in dopaminergic regions of the brain. The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility and efficacy of CES therapy in the management of symptoms of RLS. The overall study design will use mixed methods. The specific aims for the experimental analysis are to (1) determine the feasibility of the implementation of a CES treatment regimen in a population of military beneficiaries with RLS by monitoring levels of interest in the study, recruitment time, attrition rates, and adherence to the study protocol; and (2) gather preliminary data using CES to compare differences in RLS symptom severity and quality of life in individuals randomized to one of three study groups: a usual care group, an inactive (sham) device group, or an active CES device group. Because the personal impact of living with RLS has not been explored fully in the published literature, a third aim is (3) to describe the experience of individuals coping with the chronic symptoms of RLS and the impact of this disorder on their quality of life. Measurements of RLS symptom severity and quality of life will be collected over a period of 8 weeks and group differences over time will be analyzed using mixed linear models. Qualitative interview data will be analyzed using descriptive phenomenological methods. Findings from this study will inform the design and implementation of a larger study to establish the effectiveness of CES on RLS symptoms. Qualitative findings will provide much needed information on the priorities for future research and clinical management based on patients' perspectives. The ultimate goal of the research is to identify and to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of non-pharmacological treatments for RLS symptom management.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Department of Defense Health Care Beneficiary
  • A diagnosis of RLS, using criteria established by the International Restless Legs Study Group
  • Currently symptomatic
  • A period of 4 weeks of stable medication usage
  • Over the age of 18
  • Able to read, write and understand English.

排除标准

  • Pacemaker or other implanted electrical device
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Inadequately treated primary cause of RLS (i.e., iron deficiency) based on screening laboratory testing
  • Lack of a formal diagnosis of RLS

结局指标

主要结局

Change in International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) from baseline and weekly for 8 weeks post intervention

时间窗: At baseline then every week for 8 weeks

The IRLS consists of 10 questions, each with 5 possible responses geared towards assessing severity that range from no symptoms (0 points) to very severe symptoms (4 points). Scoring: Points for each response are added together to create a possible range of 0-40 with higher scores indicating worsening severity. Reliability and Validity: The IRLS demonstrated high internal consistency on 2 separate testing sessions (Cronbach's α of 0.93 and 0.95, respectively). Test/retest reliability demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.87 and paired t-test demonstrated stability over time.

次要结局

  • Qualitative Data Interview(Approximately 30-60 minute interview at any point during the study enrollment)
  • Change in the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) from baseline weekly for 8 weeks post intervention(At baseline then every week for 8 weeks)
  • Change in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) from baseline at 4 and 8 weeks post intervention(At baseline then at weeks 4 and 8)
  • Change in The Hopkins Restless Legs Syndrome Quality of Life Scale (RLS-QOL) from baseline at 4 and 8 weeks post intervention(At baseline then at weeks 4 and 8)
  • Change in the RAND 36-item Health Survey (RAND-36) from baseline at 4 and 8 weeks post intervention(At baseline then at weeks 4 and 8)

研究者

申办方类型
Fed
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验