跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04458064
NCT04458064已完成不适用

I-gel Versus Air-Q LMA for Pediatric Patients Undergoing Short-duration Surgical Procedures

Ain Shams University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 120 人开始时间: 2018年10月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
120
试验地点
1
主要终点
Supraglottic device success rate

研究概览

简要总结

This study targets to compare insertion facility, effect on hemodynamic parameters and effective ventilation using i-gel versus Air-Q LMA for pediatric patients undergoing short-duration surgical procedures.

详细描述

The patient were divided into 2 groups. I gel group and Air Q group according to LMA type used to maintain airway ventilation.

The patients were compared according to insertion facility, effect on hemodynamic parameters and effective ventilation.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Care Provider)

入排标准

年龄范围
3 Years 至 10 Years(Child)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • ASA grade I-II
  • operative time of ≤60 minutes

排除标准

  • age >10 years
  • ASA grade ≥II
  • current or recently resolved upper respiratory tract infection
  • presence of oropharynx or laryngeal pathologies or congenital anomalies
  • pathologies inducing reflux or increasing the possibility of aspiration
  • allergy to anaesthetic or drugs to be used, renal, cardiac or hepatic diseases, or bronchial asthma

结局指标

主要结局

Supraglottic device success rate

时间窗: 60 minutes

Fitness of LMA for ventilation

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Ayman Anis Metry

Assistant professor

Ain Shams University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

I-gel Versus Air-Q LMA for Pediatric Patients | 临床试验