I-gel Versus Air-Q LMA for Pediatric Patients

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Easy Insertion, Complications Ans Suitability of i Gel and Air Q LMA
• Interventions: Other: LMA i gel

• Registration Number: NCT04458064
• Lead Sponsor: Ain Shams University

Brief Summary

This study targets to compare insertion facility, effect on hemodynamic parameters and effective ventilation using i-gel versus Air-Q LMA for pediatric patients undergoing short-duration surgical procedures.

Detailed Description

The patient were divided into 2 groups. I gel group and Air Q group according to LMA type used to maintain airway ventilation.

The patients were compared according to insertion facility, effect on hemodynamic parameters and effective ventilation.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2018-10-01
• Status Verified: 2020-07
• Primary Completion: 2020-07-01
• Study Completion: 2020-07-01
• Study First Submitted: 2020-07-01
• Study First Submitted QC: 2020-07-01
• Last Update Submitted: 2020-07-01
• Study First Posted: 2020-07-07
• Last Update Posted: 2020-07-07

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 120

Inclusion Criteria

• ASA grade I-II
• operative time of ≤60 minutes

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

• age >10 years
• ASA grade ≥II
• current or recently resolved upper respiratory tract infection
• presence of oropharynx or laryngeal pathologies or congenital anomalies
• pathologies inducing reflux or increasing the possibility of aspiration
• allergy to anaesthetic or drugs to be used, renal, cardiac or hepatic diseases, or bronchial asthma

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Air Q LMA	LMA i gel	Air Q LMA was inserted for all patients
i gel	LMA i gel	I gel LMA was inserted for all patients

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Supraglottic device success rate	60 minutes	Fitness of LMA for ventilation

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ain Shams University; 🇪🇬 Cairo, Egypt