I-gel Versus Air-Q LMA for Pediatric Patients
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Easy Insertion, Complications Ans Suitability of i Gel and Air Q LMA
- Registration Number
- NCT04458064
- Lead Sponsor
- Ain Shams University
- Brief Summary
This study targets to compare insertion facility, effect on hemodynamic parameters and effective ventilation using i-gel versus Air-Q LMA for pediatric patients undergoing short-duration surgical procedures.
- Detailed Description
The patient were divided into 2 groups. I gel group and Air Q group according to LMA type used to maintain airway ventilation.
The patients were compared according to insertion facility, effect on hemodynamic parameters and effective ventilation.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 120
Inclusion Criteria
- ASA grade I-II
- operative time of ≤60 minutes
Exclusion Criteria
- age >10 years
- ASA grade ≥II
- current or recently resolved upper respiratory tract infection
- presence of oropharynx or laryngeal pathologies or congenital anomalies
- pathologies inducing reflux or increasing the possibility of aspiration
- allergy to anaesthetic or drugs to be used, renal, cardiac or hepatic diseases, or bronchial asthma
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Supraglottic device success rate 60 minutes Fitness of LMA for ventilation
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Ain Shams University
🇪🇬Cairo, Egypt
Ain Shams University🇪🇬Cairo, Egypt