To Compare the Survival Differences in Patients With HCC and Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis Treated With Liver Resection-based Therapy Versus Locoregional-based Therapy: a Prospective Cohort Study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 进行中(未招募)
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 1,076
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Overall survival
研究概览
简要总结
Hepatocellular carcinoma is prone to invade the portal vein and form portal vein thrombosis, and patients in this period are directly included in the advanced stages, i.e. Barcelona clinical liver cancer stage C. For the treatment of PVTT, there are differences between Eastern and Western guidelines, with systemic drugs being the standard of care in Western countries, while surgical treatment is often actively practiced in the Asia-Pacific region. More research is needed to explore the differences between these two approaches.
详细描述
Hepatocellular carcinoma is prone to invade the portal vein and form portal vein thrombosis, and patients in this period are directly included in the advanced stages, i.e. Barcelona clinical liver cancer stage C. For the treatment of PVTT, there are differences between Eastern and Western guidelines, with systemic drugs being the standard of care in Western countries, while surgical treatment is often actively practiced in the Asia-Pacific region. In recent years, breakthroughs have been made in the treatment of advanced HCC, and systemic drug combinations such as PD-1 inhibitors combined with targeted therapies, and local area therapy combined with systemic therapy have shown excellent anti-tumor effects. Postoperative adjuvant therapy is also advancing, and the combination of adjuvant systemic medications for patients after PVTT has also been effective in reducing postoperative recurrence. Which approach is better for PVTT patients needs to be explored in depth.
We launched the CHALLENGE-01 study in October 2023. The study consists of two phases: the first phase involves retrospective data collection from 2019 to 2023 and prospective follow-up of survival information. Specifically, the liver resection+ PD-1 inhibitor + lenvatinib (LRPL) cohort included 225 cases, the TACE + PD-1 inhibitor + lenvatinib (TPL) cohort included 205 cases, and the surgery-only treatment cohort included 200 cases as an additional control group. Data analysis from the first phase of the study showed that the median follow-up times for the LRPL and TPL cohorts were 31.6 months and 22.5 months, respectively. Based on retrospective cohort data, we calculated the sample size required for the prospective study (446) and formally initiated the second-phase prospective clinical trial in January 2024. The study completed the required enrollment from nine centers in China by December 31, 2024, but has not yet reached the primary endpoint (OS).
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Non Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Aged 18-75 years
- •Pathological type is HCC, and with PVTT
- •No extrahepatic HCC
- •Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performing status of 0-1 and Child-Pugh grade A for the liver resection group
- •ECOG performing status of 0-2 and Child-Pugh grade A-B for the locoregional-based group
- •Adequate hematologic and organ function
排除标准
- •Any history of other malignant tumors or recurrent HCC
- •Any acute active infectious diseases, active or history of autoimmune disease, or immune deficiency
- •Any persistent serious liver resection or locoregional therapy-related complications
- •Esophageal and/or gastric variceal bleeding within 6 months
- •Inability or refusal to comply with the treatment and monitoring
- •Participation in other clinical trials
结局指标
主要结局
Overall survival
时间窗: From date of include in this research until the date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 60 months.
Overall survival was defined as the period from study inclusion until death from any cause.
次要结局
- Adverse effects(12 months)
研究者
Chen Xiaoping
professor
Tongji Hospital
