Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Alkasite Restorative Material Versus Glass Ionomer Cement
- Conditions
- Tooth Decay
- Interventions
- Other: ALKASITE RESTORATIVE MATERIALOther: Glass Ionomer Cement
- Registration Number
- NCT06195449
- Lead Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Brief Summary
To evaluate the clinical and radiographic performance of Alkasite restorative material versus glass ionomer in restoration of primary molars.
- Detailed Description
Restorations replacements are mostly caused by the existence of caries lesions surrounding the restorations, which are commonly referred to as secondary caries .
Secondary or recurrent caries is characterized as "lesions that occur at the edges of previously placed dental restorations" or "caries that develop in association with dental restorations or sealants" (CARS).Proper seal at the tooth surface restoration interface is essential . That's why the most frequently material used is (GIC) with the advantage of chemical adhesion to tooth structure, superior esthetics, and long-term fluoride release providing cariostatic effect, but it has the disadvantage of slow setting rate, low fracture toughness, susceptibility to moisture contamination, dehydration during initial phase of setting, and poor wear resistance.
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite have always been the preferred material for restoration although several modifications have been made recently to improve its properties, Cent ion N is one of the recent ones.
Cent ion N is a tooth-colored basic filling material for direct restoration. It belongs to the material of Alka sites, with high flexural strength. It also has calcium and fluoride releasing properties comparable to conventional GIC, besides it is quick and easy to use.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 24
-
-
Children having carious primary molars without pulp exposure and normal radiograph.
-
Children between age 5 and 7 years. 3. Both male and female are included. 4. Cooperative Children.
-
-
- Patients with systemic diseases. 2. Parent refuse to participate.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Alkasite restorative material in primary molar ALKASITE RESTORATIVE MATERIAL ARM 1 : ALKASITE RESTORATIVE MATERIAL( INTERVENTION) Glass Ionomer Cement in primary molar Glass Ionomer Cement ARM2: Glass Ionomer Cement(CONTROL)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method recurrent caries of the tooth 12 months Radiograph \&Visual inspection using Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria (USPHS
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Anatomic Form of the tooth 12 months by Visual Inspection and Explorer using Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria (USPHS)
Color match of the restoration 12 months Visual Inspection using Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria (USPHS)
Marginal Discoloration of the tooth 12 months by Visual Inspection using Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria (USPHS)
Marginal Adaptation of the tooth 12 months by Visual Inspection and Explorer using Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria (USPHS)