MedPath

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Alkasite Restorative Material Versus Glass Ionomer Cement

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Tooth Decay
Interventions
Other: ALKASITE RESTORATIVE MATERIAL
Other: Glass Ionomer Cement
Registration Number
NCT06195449
Lead Sponsor
Cairo University
Brief Summary

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic performance of Alkasite restorative material versus glass ionomer in restoration of primary molars.

Detailed Description

Restorations replacements are mostly caused by the existence of caries lesions surrounding the restorations, which are commonly referred to as secondary caries .

Secondary or recurrent caries is characterized as "lesions that occur at the edges of previously placed dental restorations" or "caries that develop in association with dental restorations or sealants" (CARS).Proper seal at the tooth surface restoration interface is essential . That's why the most frequently material used is (GIC) with the advantage of chemical adhesion to tooth structure, superior esthetics, and long-term fluoride release providing cariostatic effect, but it has the disadvantage of slow setting rate, low fracture toughness, susceptibility to moisture contamination, dehydration during initial phase of setting, and poor wear resistance.

Resin Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite have always been the preferred material for restoration although several modifications have been made recently to improve its properties, Cent ion N is one of the recent ones.

Cent ion N is a tooth-colored basic filling material for direct restoration. It belongs to the material of Alka sites, with high flexural strength. It also has calcium and fluoride releasing properties comparable to conventional GIC, besides it is quick and easy to use.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
24
Inclusion Criteria
    1. Children having carious primary molars without pulp exposure and normal radiograph.

    2. Children between age 5 and 7 years. 3. Both male and female are included. 4. Cooperative Children.

Read More
Exclusion Criteria
    1. Patients with systemic diseases. 2. Parent refuse to participate.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Alkasite restorative material in primary molarALKASITE RESTORATIVE MATERIALARM 1 : ALKASITE RESTORATIVE MATERIAL( INTERVENTION)
Glass Ionomer Cement in primary molarGlass Ionomer CementARM2: Glass Ionomer Cement(CONTROL)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
recurrent caries of the tooth12 months

Radiograph \&Visual inspection using Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria (USPHS

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Anatomic Form of the tooth12 months

by Visual Inspection and Explorer using Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria (USPHS)

Color match of the restoration12 months

Visual Inspection using Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria (USPHS)

Marginal Discoloration of the tooth12 months

by Visual Inspection using Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria (USPHS)

Marginal Adaptation of the tooth12 months

by Visual Inspection and Explorer using Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria (USPHS)

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath