Comparative Evaluation of an Alkasite-based Restorative Material and Two Different Resin Composites in Non-carious Cervical Lesions
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Tooth Diseases
- Sponsor
- Hacettepe University
- Enrollment
- 33
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Clinical performances of different restorative systems according to FDI criteria (Esthetic properties)
- Status
- Active, not recruiting
- Last Updated
- 5 months ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The clinical performance of an an alkasite-based restorative material and two different resin composites will be evaluated and compared in non-carious cervical lesions. After recruiting participants with at least three non-carious cervical lesions, all restorations will be placed by a single clinician. Lesions will be divided in three groups: an alkasite-based restorative material (Cention N, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein (CN)), hybrid resin composite (Gradia Direct Anterior, GC, Tokyo, Japan (GD)) and a highly filled flowable resin composite ((G-aenial Universal Flo, GC, Tokyo, Japan (GF)). All restorative procedures will be conducted according to manufacturers' instructions. Restorations will be scored using FDI criteria. Descriptive statistics will be performed using chi-square tests.
Investigators
Dr. Fatma Dilşad Öz
Assoc. Prof. Dr.
Hacettepe University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Age range will be 18 to
- •They will be required to have at least three NCCLs needed restoration in different teeth.
- •All the NCCLs selected will be in similar sizes.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients with severe periodontal disease
- •Patients with rampant, uncontrolled caries
- •Patients with xerostomia
- •Patients with serious medical problems preventing them from attending review visits
- •Patients with poor gingival health
- •Patients with heavy bruxism
- •Patients with removable partial dentures
- •Patients undergoing bleaching treatment or orthodontic treatment
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Clinical performances of different restorative systems according to FDI criteria (Esthetic properties)
Time Frame: two years
Two year results according to FDI criteria. (Esthetic properties) The evaluations will be carried out using FDI criteria. Esthetic properties will be examined. Five scores will be given for each restoration: (1) Clinically excellent / very good, (2) Clinically good, (3) Clinically sufficient/satisfactory, (4) Clinically unsatisfactory, (5) Clinically poor.The data obtained for groups will be compared at each visit.
Secondary Outcomes
- Clinical performances of different restorative systems according to FDI criteria (Functional properties)(two years)