Short Term Efficacy of High-intensity Laser Therapy to Alleviate Pain in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: a Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 42
- 主要终点
- Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
研究概览
简要总结
Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is one of the most common health problems around the world. According to this, several interventions have been used to treat this group of patients including pharmacological and non-pharmacological management such as weight reduction, behavior modification, and physical therapy. Recently, high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) has been used to treat patients with KOA. The results of previous studies showed that HILT could help to reduce pain as well as improved function in patients with mild to moderate KOA. However, there were still no standardized guidelines for HILT treatment in KOA. Also, no previous studies evaluated the efficacy of HILT in patients with severe KOA. The present study, therefore, recruited not only mild to a moderate degree but also severe degree. The study aim was to determine the efficacy of HILT in terms of pain relief in patients with mild, moderate, and severe KOA. The hypothesis was HILT would effectively reduce pain in patients with KOA compared to sham laser plus conservative treatment.
详细描述
- This study is a double-blinded randomized control trial that compared the efficacy of HPLT to sham laser in patients with KOA.
- 42 patients who had KOA diagnosed by the American college of rheumatology (ACR) 2016 guidelines were recruited including a drop out of 20%.
- The participants were then randomly allocated into two groups (21 participants per group), mainly HILT and sham laser. Also, both groups received conservative treatment such as disease education, exercise, and advice for weight reduction.
- The intervention group received HILT which was applied on the medial, lateral, and posterior part of the knee joint. The total energy was 562.5 J per session which was done 2-3 sessions a week, for a total of 10 sessions.
- The control group received sham laser by the same device for 10 sessions plus conservative treatment as in the intervention group.
- The outcome measures, VAS and T-WOMAC score were recorded before and at the end of the study.
- Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 18.0 version to evaluate the statistically significant change within the same group and the difference between groups.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 50 Years 至 80 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Patients with primary knee OA diagnosed based on the American college of rheumatology (ACR) guidelines for early diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis
- •Patients who had knee pain for at least 6 months and had VAS score greater than 4 out of 10 points
- •Patients with knee OA who have Kellgren And Lawrence (KL) classification stages 2-4.
排除标准
- •Patients who have secondary knee OA caused by other pathologies
- •Patients who have a history of corticosteroid or hyaluronate injecting into the knee joint within the past 6 months
- •Patients who were treated by physical therapy equipment within 1 month before the study
- •History of stroke, bleeding disorders, cancer, deep vein thrombosis, cognitive impairment, or mental disorders
- •Contraindicate to laser therapy
结局指标
主要结局
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
时间窗: VAS was recorded in the two time points. The first time point was at the baseline or before starting the treatment. After that, VAS was recorded post-intervention (at 4 weeks from baseline) as the second time point.
VAS is the standardized pain measurement which allows subjects to rate pain score by using the ruler scale. This pain scale starts from 0 which means no pain to 10 which means maximum pain.
次要结局
- Thai version of the Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index for knee osteoarthritis (T-WOMAC)(T-WOMAC was recorded in the two time points. First, T-WOMAC was recorded at the baseline and was then recorded post-intervention (at 4 weeks from baseline) as the second time point.)