跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01057394
NCT01057394终止4 期

Post-Market Randomized Controlled Trial: Endoscopically- Guided Ablation vs. Radiofrequency Ablation GuideD by Electroanatomical Mapping to Achieve Permanent Pulmonary Vein Isolation (En-GARDE)

CardioFocus4 个研究点 分布在 2 个国家目标入组 21 人开始时间: 2009年12月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
终止
发起方
CardioFocus
入组人数
21
试验地点
4
主要终点
Rate of Permanent Pulmonary Vein Isolation of EAS-AC Compared to EAM Guided Radiofrequency Ablation

研究概览

简要总结

To compare the safety and chronic Pulmonary Vein isolation of 2 ablation types.

  1. visually guided ablation (VGA) using the EAS-AC and
  2. radiofrequency ablation

详细描述

The goal of the study was to compare two interventions, visually-guided endoscopic ablation to standard-of-care radiofrequency (RF) ablation. The study was terminated early by the Sponsor for business reasons before any participants were randomized or treated with RF ablation.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Rate of Permanent Pulmonary Vein Isolation of EAS-AC Compared to EAM Guided Radiofrequency Ablation

时间窗: 3 Months

Number of initially isolated pulmonary veins that remain isolated at a 3 month remapping. The unit of measure is treated pulmonary veins (PVs).

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
CardioFocus
申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (4)

Loading locations...

相似试验