The Long-term Safety and Efficacy of CDP6038 (Olokizumab) With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Interventions
- Biological: CDP6038 (olokizumab)
- Registration Number
- NCT01533714
- Lead Sponsor
- UCB BIOSCIENCES, Inc.
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of CDP6038 (olokizumab) treatment in adult subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who completed study RA0083 \[NCT01463059\].
- Detailed Description
Male and female subjects were randomized in a multi-center, open-label, follow-up study to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of a subcutaneous dose of 120 mg CDP6038 (olokizumab), every 2 weeks (q2w), for the treatment of active RA.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 103
- Completed the RA0083 [NCT01463059] study (Week 12 Visit)
- Must have maintained their stable dose (and route) of methotrexate (MTX) between 6 to 16 mg/week in Japan or 7.5 to 20 mg/week in Korea and Taiwan in RA0083 [NCT01463059], and plan to maintain this same dose and route of administration for at least 12 weeks
- Female subjects must be either postmenopausal for at least 1 year, surgically incapable of childbearing, or effectively practicing 2 acceptable methods of contraception
- Have an ongoing SAE from the RA0083 [NCT01463059] study
- Female subjects who are breast-feeding, pregnant, or plan to become pregnant during the study or within 24 weeks
- Have evidence of active or latent tuberculosis (TB)
- Subject is receiving any biologic response modifier or synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) other than MTX
- Subject has planned surgery during the first 12 weeks of the study
- Subjects who tested positive for hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) and/or hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) at Screening in RA0083 [NCT01463059] and who subsequently test positive for hepatitis B virus deoxyribonucleic acid (HBV DNA) at Week 12 of RA0083 [NCT01463059]
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description CDP6038 (olokizumab) CDP6038 (olokizumab) CDP6038 (olokizumab) 120 mg: subcutaneous injections at q2w (every two weeks). RA0089 is a single arm study, however, analysis will be presented according to the original treatment arms of the parent study NCT01463059 (RA0083).
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Total Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0089) until 30 days after the last dose (maximum up to 562 days) Reported TEAEs included adverse events that started or worsened after the first dose of CDP6038 (olokizumab) in Study RA0089 and within 30 days after the last dose.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) in the Disease Activity Score-28-joint Count (C-reactive Protein) (DAS28[CRP]) at Week 12 of Study RA0089 Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) and Week 12 (Study RA0089) DAS28(CRP) was calculated using tender/painful joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) from 28 joints, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA)-Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and CRP as per formula: DAS28(CRP)=0.56 \* (TJC)\^1/2 + 0.28 \* (SJC)\^1/2 + 0.36 \* ln(CRP\[mg/L\]+1) + 0.014 \* PtGADA + 0.96 Assessments: •TJC and SJC: assessed on same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • CRP value calculated in mg/L. 28 joints included shoulders, elbows, wrists; metacarpophalangeal (MCP), thumb interphalangeal (IP), and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of hands; and knees. Scores on DAS28(CRP) range from 0 to approximately 10, where scores greater than (\>) 5.1 correspond with active disease, scores less than (\<) 3.2 correspond with well controlled disease, and scores \<2.6 correspond with remission or similar. A negative change in DAS28(CRP) score indicates an improvement in disease activity.
Change From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) in DAS28(CRP) at Week 24 of Study RA0089 Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) and Week 24 (Study RA0089) DAS28(CRP) was calculated using the TJC and SJC from 28 joints, the PtGADA-VAS, andCRP according to the formula: DAS28(CRP)=0.56 \* (TJC)\^1/2 + 0.28 \* (SJC)\^1/2 + 0.36 \* ln(CRP\[mg/L\]+1) + 0.014 \* PtGADA + 0.96 Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • CRP value calculated in mg/L. The 28 joints included shoulders, elbows, wrists; MCP, thumb IP, and PIP joints of hands; and knees. Scores on DAS28(CRP) range from 0 to approximately 10, where scores \>5.1 correspond with active disease, scores \<3.2 correspond with well controlled disease, and scores \<2.6 correspond with remission or similar. A negative change in DAS28(CRP) score indicates an improvement in disease activity.
Change From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) in DAS28(CRP) at Week 48 of Study RA0089 Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) and Week 48 (Study RA0089) DAS28(CRP) was calculated using the TJC and SJC from 28 joints, the PtGADA-VAS, andCRP according to the formula: DAS28(CRP)=0.56 \* (TJC)\^1/2 + 0.28 \* (SJC)\^1/2 + 0.36 \* ln(CRP\[mg/L\]+1) + 0.014 \* PtGADA + 0.96 Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • CRP value calculated in mg/L. The 28 joints included shoulders, elbows, wrists; MCP, thumb IP, and PIP joints of hands; and knees. Scores on DAS28(CRP) range from 0 to approximately 10, where scores \>5.1 correspond with active disease, scores \<3.2 correspond with well controlled disease, and scores \<2.6 correspond with remission or similar. A negative change in DAS28(CRP) score indicates an improvement in disease activity.
Change From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) in DAS28(CRP) at Week 96 of Study RA0089 Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) and Week 96 (Study RA0089) DAS28(CRP) was calculated using the TJC and SJC from 28 joints, the PtGADA-VAS, andCRP according to the formula: DAS28(CRP)=0.56 \* (TJC)\^1/2 + 0.28 \* (SJC)\^1/2 + 0.36 \* ln(CRP\[mg/L\]+1) + 0.014 \* PtGADA + 0.96 Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • CRP value calculated in mg/L. The 28 joints included shoulders, elbows, wrists; MCP, thumb IP, and PIP joints of hands; and knees. Scores on DAS28(CRP) range from 0 to approximately 10, where scores \>5.1 correspond with active disease, scores \<3.2 correspond with well controlled disease, and scores \<2.6 correspond with remission or similar. A negative change in DAS28(CRP) score indicates an improvement in disease activity. Since the study was terminated early before Week 96, no results data are available for analysis at the Week 96 time point and this Outcome Measure has zero total participants analyzed.
The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20) Improvement Criteria Response Rate From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) at Week 12 of Study RA0089 Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) and Week 12 (Study RA0089) ACR20 represents at least 20% improvement from Baseline in TJC (68 joints) + in SJC (66 joints) + in at least 3 of 5 core set measures: PtGADA-VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA)-VAS, Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PAAP)-VAS, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and CRP. Assessments: • TJC and SJC: same 2-point scale (0=absent;1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms;100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic, no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable, inability to carry out all normal activities). • PAAP: 100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain). • HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), total score (0-3) computed from item scores, with lower scores meaning less disability. • CRP in mg/L. Missing values were considered as non-responding status.
The ACR20 Improvement Criteria Response Rate From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) at Week 24 of Study RA0089 Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) and Week 24 (Study RA0089) ACR20 represents at least 20% improvement from Baseline in TJC (68 joints) + SJC (66 joints) + in at least 3 of 5 core set measures: PtGADA-VAS, PhGADA-VAS, PAAP-VAS, HAQ-DI and CRP. Assessments: • TJC and SJC: same 2-point scale (0=absent;1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms;100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic, no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable, inability to carry out all normal activities). • PAAP: 100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain). • HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), total score (0-3) computed from item scores, with lower scores meaning less disability. • CRP in mg/L. Missing values were considered as non-responding status.
The ACR20 Improvement Criteria Response Rate From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) at Week 48 of Study RA0089 Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) and Week 48 (Study RA0089) ACR20 represents at least 20% improvement from Baseline in TJC (68 joints) + SJC (66 joints) + in at least 3 of 5 core set measures: PtGADA-VAS, PhGADA-VAS, PAAP-VAS, HAQ-DI and CRP. Assessments: • TJC and SJC: same 2-point scale (0=absent;1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms;100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic, no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable, inability to carry out all normal activities). • PAAP: 100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain). • HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), total score (0-3) computed from item scores, with lower scores meaning less disability. • CRP in mg/L. Missing values were considered as non-responding status.
The ACR20 Improvement Criteria Response Rate From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) at Week 96 of Study RA0089 Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) and Week 96 (Study RA0089) ACR20: at least 20% improvement from Baseline in TJC (68 joints) + SJC (66 joints) + in at least 3 of 5 core set measures: PtGADA-VAS, PhGADA-VAS, PAAP-VAS, HAQ-DI and CRP. Assessments: • TJC and SJC: same 2-point scale (0=absent;1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms;100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic, no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable, inability to carry out all normal activities). • PAAP: 100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain). • HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), total score (0-3) computed from item scores, with lower scores meaning less disability. • CRP in mg/L. Missing values were considered as non-responding status. Since the study was terminated early before Week 96, no data was collected and analyzed at the Week 96 and this Outcome Measure has zero total participants analyzed.
The ACR 50% (ACR50) Improvement Criteria Response Rate From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) at Week 12 of Study RA0089 Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) and Week 12 (Study RA0089) ACR50 represents at least 50% improvement from Baseline in TJC (68 joints) + in SJC (66 joints) + in at least 3 of 5 core set measures: PtGADA-VAS, PhGADA-VAS, PAAP-VAS, HAQ-DI and CRP. Assessments: • TJC and SJC: same 2-point scale (0=absent;1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms;100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic, no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable, inability to carry out all normal activities). • PAAP: 100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain). • HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), total score (0-3) computed from item scores, with lower scores meaning less disability. • CRP in mg/L. Missing values were considered as non-responding status.
The ACR50 Improvement Criteria Response Rate From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) at Week 24 of Study RA0089 Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) and Week 24 (Study RA0089) ACR50 represents at least 50% improvement from Baseline in TJC (68 joints) + in SJC (66 joints) + in at least 3 of 5 core set measures: PtGADA-VAS, PhGADA-VAS, PAAP-VAS, HAQ-DI and CRP. Assessments: • TJC and SJC: same 2-point scale (0=absent;1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms;100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic, no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable, inability to carry out all normal activities). • PAAP: 100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain). • HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), total score (0-3) computed from item scores, with lower scores meaning less disability. • CRP in mg/L. Missing values were considered as non-responding status.
The ACR50 Improvement Criteria Response Rate From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) at Week 48 of Study RA0089 Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) and Week 48 (Study RA0089) ACR50 represents at least 50% improvement from Baseline in TJC (68 joints) + in SJC (66 joints) + in at least 3 of 5 core set measures: PtGADA-VAS, PhGADA-VAS, PAAP-VAS, HAQ-DI and CRP. Assessments: • TJC and SJC: same 2-point scale (0=absent;1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms;100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic, no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable, inability to carry out all normal activities). • PAAP: 100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain). • HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), total score (0-3) computed from item scores, with lower scores meaning less disability. • CRP in mg/L. Missing values were considered as non-responding status.
The ACR50 Improvement Criteria Response Rate From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) at Week 96 of Study RA0089 Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) and Week 96 (Study RA0089) ACR50:atleast 50% improvement from Baseline in TJC (68 joints) + in SJC (66 joints) + in at least 3 of 5 core set measures: PtGADA-VAS, PhGADA-VAS, PAAP-VAS, HAQ-DI and CRP. Assessments: • TJC and SJC: same 2-point scale (0=absent;1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms;100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic, no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable, inability to carry out all normal activities). • PAAP: 100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain). • HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), total score (0-3) computed from item scores, with lower scores meaning less disability. • CRP in mg/L. Missing values were considered as non-responding status. Since the study was terminated early before Week 96, no data was collected and analyzed at the Week 96 and this Outcome Measure has zero total participants analyzed.
The ACR 70% (ACR70) Improvement Criteria Response Rate From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) at Week 12 of Study RA0089 Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) and Week 12 (Study RA0089) ACR70 represents at least 70% improvement from Baseline in TJC (68 joints) + in SJC (66 joints) + in at least 3 of 5 core set measures: PtGADA-VAS, PhGADA-VAS, PAAP-VAS, HAQ-DI and CRP. Assessments: • TJC and SJC: same 2-point scale (0=absent;1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms;100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic, no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable, inability to carry out all normal activities). • PAAP: 100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain). • HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), total score (0-3) computed from item scores, with lower scores meaning less disability. • CRP in mg/L. Missing values were considered as non-responding status.
The ACR70 Improvement Criteria Response Rate From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) at Week 24 of Study RA0089 Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) and Week 24 (Study RA0089) ACR70 represents at least 70% improvement from Baseline in TJC (68 joints) + in SJC (66 joints) + in at least 3 of 5 core set measures: PtGADA-VAS, PhGADA-VAS, PAAP-VAS, HAQ-DI and CRP. Assessments: • TJC and SJC: same 2-point scale (0=absent;1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms;100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic, no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable, inability to carry out all normal activities). • PAAP: 100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain). • HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), total score (0-3) computed from item scores, with lower scores meaning less disability. • CRP in mg/L. Missing values were considered as non-responding status.
The ACR70 Improvement Criteria Response Rate From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) at Week 48 of Study RA0089 Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) and Week 48 (Study RA0089) ACR70 represents at least 70% improvement from Baseline in TJC (68 joints) + in SJC (66 joints) + in at least 3 of 5 core set measures: PtGADA-VAS, PhGADA-VAS, PAAP-VAS, HAQ-DI and CRP. Assessments: • TJC and SJC: same 2-point scale (0=absent;1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms;100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic, no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable, inability to carry out all normal activities). • PAAP: 100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain). • HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), total score (0-3) computed from item scores, with lower scores meaning less disability. • CRP in mg/L. Missing values were considered as non-responding status.
The ACR70 Improvement Criteria Response Rate From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) at Week 96 of Study RA0089 Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) and Week 96 (Study RA0089) ACR70:atleast 70% improvement from Baseline in TJC (68 joints) + in SJC (66 joints) + in at least 3 of 5 core set measures: PtGADA-VAS, PhGADA-VAS, PAAP-VAS, HAQ-DI and CRP. Assessments: • TJC and SJC: same 2-point scale (0=absent;1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms;100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic, no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable, inability to carry out all normal activities). • PAAP: 100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain). • HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), total score (0-3) computed from item scores, with lower scores meaning less disability. • CRP in mg/L. Missing values were considered as non-responding status. Since the study was terminated early before Week 96, no data was collected and analyzed at the Week 96 and this Outcome Measure has zero total participants analyzed.
Percentage of Subjects With DAS28(CRP) <2.6 at Week 12 of Study RA0089 Week 12 (Study RA0089) DAS28(CRP) was calculated using the TJC and SJC from 28 joints, the PtGADA-VAS, andCRP according to the formula: DAS28(CRP)=0.56 \* (TJC)\^1/2 + 0.28 \* (SJC)\^1/2 + 0.36 \* ln(CRP\[mg/L\]+1) + 0.014 \* PtGADA + 0.96 Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • CRP value calculated in mg/L. The 28 joints included shoulders, elbows, wrists; MCP, thumb IP, and PIP joints of hands; and knees. Scores on DAS28(CRP) range from 0 to approximately 10, where scores \>5.1 correspond with active disease, scores \<3.2 correspond with well controlled disease, and scores \<2.6 correspond with remission or similar. Percentage of participants with DAS28(CRP) \<2.6 were reported.
Percentage of Subjects With DAS28(CRP) <2.6 at Week 24 of Study RA0089 Week 24 (Study RA0089) DAS28(CRP) was calculated using the TJC and SJC from 28 joints, the PtGADA-VAS, andCRP according to the formula: DAS28(CRP)=0.56 \* (TJC)\^1/2 + 0.28 \* (SJC)\^1/2 + 0.36 \* ln(CRP\[mg/L\]+1) + 0.014 \* PtGADA + 0.96 Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • CRP value calculated in mg/L. The 28 joints included shoulders, elbows, wrists; MCP, thumb IP, and PIP joints of hands; and knees. Scores on DAS28(CRP) range from 0 to approximately 10, where scores \>5.1 correspond with active disease, scores \<3.2 correspond with well controlled disease, and scores \<2.6 correspond with remission or similar. Percentage of participants with DAS28(CRP) \<2.6 were reported.
Percentage of Subjects With DAS28(CRP) <2.6 at Week 48 of Study RA0089 Week 48 (Study RA0089) DAS28(CRP) was calculated using the TJC and SJC from 28 joints, the PtGADA-VAS, andCRP according to the formula: DAS28(CRP)=0.56 \* (TJC)\^1/2 + 0.28 \* (SJC)\^1/2 + 0.36 \* ln(CRP\[mg/L\]+1) + 0.014 \* PtGADA + 0.96 Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • CRP value calculated in mg/L. The 28 joints included shoulders, elbows, wrists; MCP, thumb IP, and PIP joints of hands; and knees. Scores on DAS28(CRP) range from 0 to approximately 10, where scores \>5.1 correspond with active disease, scores \<3.2 correspond with well controlled disease, and scores \<2.6 correspond with remission or similar. Percentage of participants with DAS28(CRP) \<2.6 were reported.
Percentage of Subjects With DAS28(CRP) <2.6 at Week 96 of Study RA0089 Week 96 (Study RA0089) DAS28(CRP) was calculated using the TJC and SJC from 28 joints, the PtGADA-VAS, andCRP according to the formula: DAS28(CRP)=0.56 \* (TJC)\^1/2 + 0.28 \* (SJC)\^1/2 + 0.36 \* ln(CRP\[mg/L\]+1) + 0.014 \* PtGADA + 0.96 Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • CRP value calculated in mg/L. The 28 joints included shoulders, elbows, wrists; MCP, thumb IP, and PIP joints of hands; and knees. Scores on DAS28(CRP) range from 0 to approximately 10, where scores \>5.1 correspond with active disease, scores \<3.2 correspond with well controlled disease, and scores \<2.6 correspond with remission or similar. Percentage of participants with DAS28(CRP) \<2.6 were reported. Since the study was terminated early before Week 96, no data was collected and analyzed at the Week 96 and this Outcome Measure has zero total participants analyzed.
Percentage of Subjects With DAS28(CRP) ≤3.2 at Week 12 of Study RA0089 Week 12 (Study RA0089) DAS28(CRP) was calculated using the TJC and SJC from 28 joints, the PtGADA-VAS, andCRP according to the formula: DAS28(CRP)=0.56 \* (TJC)\^1/2 + 0.28 \* (SJC)\^1/2 + 0.36 \* ln(CRP\[mg/L\]+1) + 0.014 \* PtGADA + 0.96 Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • CRP value calculated in mg/L. The 28 joints included shoulders, elbows, wrists; MCP, thumb IP, and PIP joints of hands; and knees. Scores on DAS28(CRP) range from 0 to approximately 10, where scores \>5.1 correspond with active disease, scores \<3.2 correspond with well controlled disease, and scores \<2.6 correspond with remission or similar. Percentage of participants with DAS28(CRP) less than or equal to (≤) 3.2 were reported.
Percentage of Subjects With DAS28(CRP) ≤3.2 at Week 24 of Study RA0089 Week 24 (Study RA0089) DAS28(CRP) was calculated using the TJC and SJC from 28 joints, the PtGADA-VAS, andCRP according to the formula: DAS28(CRP)=0.56 \* (TJC)\^1/2 + 0.28 \* (SJC)\^1/2 + 0.36 \* ln(CRP\[mg/L\]+1) + 0.014 \* PtGADA + 0.96 Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • CRP value calculated in mg/L. The 28 joints included shoulders, elbows, wrists; MCP, thumb IP, and PIP joints of hands; and knees. Scores on DAS28(CRP) range from 0 to approximately 10, where scores \>5.1 correspond with active disease, scores \<3.2 correspond with well controlled disease, and scores \<2.6 correspond with remission or similar. Percentage of participants with DAS28(CRP) ≤3.2 were reported.
Percentage of Subjects With DAS28(CRP) ≤3.2 at Week 48 of Study RA0089 Week 48 (Study RA0089) DAS28(CRP) was calculated using the TJC and SJC from 28 joints, the PtGADA-VAS, andCRP according to the formula: DAS28(CRP)=0.56 \* (TJC)\^1/2 + 0.28 \* (SJC)\^1/2 + 0.36 \* ln(CRP\[mg/L\]+1) + 0.014 \* PtGADA + 0.96 Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • CRP value calculated in mg/L. The 28 joints included shoulders, elbows, wrists; MCP, thumb IP, and PIP joints of hands; and knees. Scores on DAS28(CRP) range from 0 to approximately 10, where scores \>5.1 correspond with active disease, scores \<3.2 correspond with well controlled disease, and scores \<2.6 correspond with remission or similar. Percentage of participants with DAS28(CRP) ≤3.2 were reported.
Percentage of Subjects With DAS28(CRP) ≤3.2 at Week 96 of Study RA0089 Week 96 (Study RA0089) DAS28(CRP) was calculated using the TJC and SJC from 28 joints, the PtGADA-VAS, andCRP according to the formula: DAS28(CRP)=0.56 \* (TJC)\^1/2 + 0.28 \* (SJC)\^1/2 + 0.36 \* ln(CRP\[mg/L\]+1) + 0.014 \* PtGADA + 0.96 Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 100 mm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • CRP value calculated in mg/L. The 28 joints included shoulders, elbows, wrists; MCP, thumb IP, and PIP joints of hands; and knees. Scores on DAS28(CRP) range from 0 to approximately 10, where scores \>5.1 correspond with active disease, scores \<3.2 correspond with well controlled disease, and scores \<2.6 correspond with remission or similar. Since the study was terminated early before Week 96, no data was collected and analyzed at the Week 96 and this Outcome Measure has zero total participants analyzed.
Change From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) in the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Week 48 of Study RA0089 Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) and Week 48 (Study RA0089) CDAI was calculated using the TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), PtGADA-VAS and PhGADA-VAS, according to the following formula: SJC + TJC + PtGADA + PhGADA Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on the same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 10 cm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 10 cm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities; 100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). The 28 joints included the shoulders, elbows, wrists; MCP, thumb IP, and PIP joints of the hands; and the knees. Total score range is from 0-100, with the high scores representing high disease activity. A negative change in CDAI score indicates an improvement in disease activity.
Change From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) CDAI at Week 96 of Study RA0089 Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) and Week 96 (Study RA0089) CDAI was calculated using the TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), PtGADA-VAS and PhGADA-VAS, according to the following formula: SJC + TJC + PtGADA + PhGADA Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on the same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 10 cm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 10 cm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities; 100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). The 28 joints included the shoulders, elbows, wrists; MCP, thumb IP, and PIP joints of the hands; and the knees. Total score range is from 0-100, with the high scores representing high disease activity. A negative change in CDAI score indicates an improvement in disease activity. Since the study was terminated early before Week 96, no data was collected and analyzed at the Week 96 and this Outcome Measure has zero total participants analyzed.
Change From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) in the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Week 48 of Study RA0089 Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) and Week 48 (Study RA0089) SDAI was calculated using the TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), PtGADA-VAS, PhGADA-VAS and CRP (mg/dL\]), according to the following formula: SJC + TJC + PtGADA + PhGADA + CRP (mg/dL) Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on the same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 10 cm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 10 cm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities; 100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). • CRP range was from 0 to 10 mg/dL. The 28 joints included the shoulders, elbows, wrists; MCP, thumb IP, and PIP joints of the hands; and the knees. The SDAI score ranges from 0 to 86, with higher scores representing worse disease. A negative change in SDAI score indicates an improvement in disease activity.
Change From Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) in the SDAI at Week 96 of Study RA0089 Baseline (Week 0 of Study RA0083) and Week 96 (Study RA0089) SDAI was calculated using the TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), PtGADA-VAS, PhGADA-VAS and CRP (mg/dL\]), as per formula: SJC + TJC + PtGADA + PhGADA + CRP (mg/dL) Assessments: • TJC and SJC: assessed on the same 2-point scale (0=absent; 1=present). • PtGADA: 10 cm VAS (0=very good, no symptoms; 100=very poor, severe symptoms). • PhGADA: 10 cm VAS (0=very good, asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities; 100=very poor, very severe symptoms which were intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). • CRP range was from 0 to 10 mg/dL. The 28 joints included the shoulders, elbows, wrists; MCP, thumb IP, and PIP joints of the hands; and the knees. SDAI score ranges from 0 to 86, with higher scores representing worse disease. A negative change in SDAI score indicates an improvement in disease activity. Since the study was terminated early before Week 96, no data was collected and analyzed at the Week 96 and this Outcome Measure has zero total participants analyzed.
Plasma Concentration of CDP6038 (Olokizumab) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 72, 96, 120 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 72, 96, 120 The CDP6038 (olokizumab) plasma levels data were not collected and analyzed. This Outcome Measure therefore has zero total participants analyzed.
Plasma Concentration of Anti-CDP6038 (Olokizumab) Antibodies at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 72, 96 and 120 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 72, 96, 120 The CDP6038 (olokizumab) plasma levels data were not collected and analyzed. This Outcome Measure therefore has zero total participants analyzed.
Trial Locations
- Locations (32)
309
🇨🇳Taipei, Taiwan
302
🇨🇳Taipei, Taiwan
308
🇨🇳Taipei, Taiwan
200
🇰🇷Daejeon, Korea, Republic of
203
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of
114
🇯🇵Fukuoka, Japan
113
🇯🇵Hiroshima, Japan
120
🇯🇵Kakogawa, Japan
301
🇨🇳Taichung, Taiwan
118
🇯🇵Kumamoto, Japan
107
🇯🇵Nagaoka, Japan
104
🇯🇵Yotukaido, Japan
115
🇯🇵Fukuoka, Japan
204
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of
102
🇯🇵Chiba, Japan
101
🇯🇵Tomakomai, Japan
116
🇯🇵Kurume, Japan
202
🇰🇷Seongdong-Gu, Korea, Republic of
306
🇨🇳Taichung, Taiwan
307
🇨🇳Taichung, Taiwan
122
🇯🇵Matsuyama, Japan
112
🇯🇵Okayama, Japan
110
🇯🇵Nagoya, Japan
100
🇯🇵Sapporo, Japan
117
🇯🇵Sasebo, Japan
123
🇯🇵Tokyo, Japan
108
🇯🇵Tonami, Japan
111
🇯🇵Tsu, Japan
103
🇯🇵Narita, Japan
105
🇯🇵Yokohama, Japan
119
🇯🇵Oita, Japan
201
🇰🇷Jung-Gu, Korea, Republic of