跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02270190
NCT02270190Unknown不适用

Evaluating the Effectivenemss of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation as a Treatment for Tenesmus in Patients With Pelvic Floor Disorders

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 10 人开始时间: 2014年8月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
10
试验地点
2
主要终点
improve the symptom of tenesmus in patients with pelvic floor disorders

研究概览

简要总结

The main research question is to see if Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) can improve the symptom of tenesmus in patients with pelvic floor disorders. This includes those who have rectal cancer in situ or who are post-rectal cancer treatment and have Anterior Resection Syndrome.

The secondary research questions are to see if other pelvic floor symptoms and quality of life improves for this patient group and if levels of anxiety and depression improve for these patients.

详细描述

The aim of the study is to discover if PTNS can be used to reduce the symptoms in those patients with tenesmus due to their pelvic floor disorders. These pelvic floor disorders include rectal cancer in situ, Anterior Resection Syndrome developed after rectal-cancer treatment, or gynaecological problems. Gynaecological problems that can cause tenesmus include radiotherapy for gynaecological cancer, ovarian cysts, pelvic organ prolapse and hysterectomy.

Currently, there is a lack of treatment options available to manage patients with tenesmus and it is hoped that PTNS will provide a simple, non-invasive treatment to this wide patient group with distressing symptoms. Assessment of symptom improvement will be used by analysing the change in scores on the COREFO, e-PAQ and HADS questionnaires, which will be completed pre and post treatment. COREFO is a validated questionnaire which includes questions specifically relating to tenesmus. e-PAQ is a validated questionnaire which looks at all aspects of the pelvic floor (bowel, urinary, vaginal, sexual) along with quality of life. HADS is a validated questionnaire classifying the patient's degree of anxiety and depression as either "normal", "borderline abnormal" or "abnormal".

There have been two pilot studies looking into the effect of PTNS in improving symptoms in Anterior Resection Syndrome patients. However, full papers have not been published of this data. These two studies assessed symptom improvement using questionnaires, but they did not use COREFO, e-PAQ or HADS, or include patients who currently have rectal cancer (i.e. not Anterior Resection Syndrome patients) or gynaecological problems and have the same tenesmus symptoms. Thus this makes this research an original proposal. e-PAQ is widely used in STH to assess pelvic floor symptoms, and thus its use here enables comparison with other patient groups who also have PTNS as a treatment option.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients that have tenesmus who are post-rectal cancer treatment and have Anterior Resection Syndrome.
  • Patients that have tenesmus who have a rectal cancer.
  • Patients that have tenesmus due to a gynaecological condition.

排除标准

  • Anyone under the age of
  • Anyone with a pacemaker or implantable defibrillator.
  • Anyone who is prone to excessive bleeding.
  • Anyone who is pregnant or is planning on becoming pregnant throughout their time in the trial.
  • Anyone with diabetic neuropathy, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease or peripheral neuropathy.
  • Inability to provide consent for the research study.
  • Anatomical limitations that would prevent successful placement of needle electrode.
  • Present evidence of external full thickness rectal prolapse.
  • Stoma in situ.

结局指标

主要结局

improve the symptom of tenesmus in patients with pelvic floor disorders

时间窗: 12 weeks

The degree of success of the PTNS treatment will be measured by comparing the results from the COREFO, e-PAQ and HADS questionnaires before and after the 12 weeks of treatment. The treatment will be deemed successful if the post-treatment score is significantly lower than the pre-treatment score.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验