Studying the efficacy of using lidocaine and dexmedetomidine as an alternative to propofol to provide sedation for patients undergoing colonoscopy.
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Sedation for colonoscopyOral and Gastrointestinal - Other diseases of the mouth, teeth, oesophagus, digestive system including liver and colonAnaesthesiology - Anaesthetics
- Registration Number
- ACTRN12620000249954
- Lead Sponsor
- MC Royal Hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 62
Inclusion Criteria
All adult ASA I and II patients admitted for elective colonoscopy
Exclusion Criteria
Patients with bradycardia (heart rate < 55/min).
Patients with known allergy to. lidocaine or dexemedotimidine
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method patient satisfaction by the procedure and sedation.<br>It will be assessed by a scale from 0 to 10 where 0 means not at all satisfied and 10 means maximally satisfied.<br>patient will be asked to give the scale score once he/she is fully awake.<br>Patient satisfaction is a composite primary outcome[immediately after recovery]
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Heart rate<br> monitored by ECG monitors [during the procedure];Apnic attacks .<br>assessed by clinical observation and monitoring.<br>apnic attacks means ( number of times where the patient stops breathing[during the procedure];Pain score , assessed by the numerical pain score[Immediately after recovery];time to discharge to home which will be known from the doctor order for discharge and the data will be collected from the medical records.[time of discharge ];Blood pressure <br>continuously monitored by non-invasive bench-top sphygmomanometer [throughout the procedure];oxygen saturation by the pulse-oximetry[throughout the procedure]