Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06792565
NCT06792565CompletedNot Applicable

Hemofilters vs. Hemodialyzers: Impacts on Cytokine Removal During Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery

Alnas Hospital1 site in 1 country60 target enrollmentStarted: March 22, 2024Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
60
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
IL6 level as a proinflammatory cytokine

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) allowed the correction of several congenital heart diseases such as intracardiac malformations, but it is well known that this is not a harmless procedure because it can lead to a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), with activation of complement, cytokines, coagulation, and fibrinolysis pathways.

Due to economic causes, hemofilters became less available in low-resource countries, which forced perfusionists to use hemodialyzers instead during CPB. Preliminary data showed the potential safety of using hemodialyzers instead of hemofilters in Zero-balanced ultrafiltration.

The Objectives of the study This study aims to compare impact of hemofilters and hemodialyzers on cytokine removal during cardiopulmonary bypass in pediatric cardiac surgery.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
— to 15 Years (Child)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Pediatric patients who are undergoing elective cardiothoracic surgery which cardiopulmonary bypass will be conducted.
  • •Age of patients from 1 year to 15 years.
  • •CPB duration more than 60 minutes.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Pediatric patients with known signs of sepsis.
  • •Pediatric patients having had previous cardiothoracic surgery.
  • •Preoperative renal failure.
  • •Preoperative cardiogenic shock requiring the use of inotropes.
  • •Preoperative lactate concentration > 2 mmol/L.

Arms & Interventions

hemodialyzers

Experimental

20 patients

Intervention: hemodializer (Device)

hemofilters

Active Comparator

20 patients

Intervention: hemofilter (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

IL6 level as a proinflammatory cytokine

Time Frame: preoperatively after induction of anesthesia (T1), after removal of aorta cross clamp and before starting zero-balanced ultrafiltration (T2) and after coming off CPB (T3).

Secondary Outcomes

  • Other proinflammatory cytokine(preoperatively after induction of anesthesia (T1), after removal of aorta cross clamp and before starting zero-balanced ultrafiltration (T2) and after coming off CPB (T3).)

Investigators

Sponsor
Alnas Hospital
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials