Maxillary Primary Molars Anaesthesia
- Conditions
- Effectiveness of articaine in comparison to lidocaine during maxillary primary molars extraction.
- Registration Number
- IRCT20191002044953N1
- Lead Sponsor
- Yazd University of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
Children who require bilateral extraction of primary maxillary molars
Children with grade 3 or 4 of frankl behavior rating scale
Unrestorable primary maxillary molars
primary maxillary molars with at least one third of the root length
Children without systemic disease or drug allergy
Children with ability of communication in persian language
Children without learning disability
Uncooperative children
Teeth with acute abscess
Use of analgesics before treatment
Failure in complete anaesthesia after injection
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Score of self-reported pain by children during maxillary primary molars extraction based on Wong Baker Facial Pain Scale after anaesthesia with lidocaine or articaine. Timepoint: After tooth exrtraction. Method of measurement: Wong Baker Facial Pain Scale.;Calculated score of child pain by investigator during maxillary primary molars extraction based on Face Leg Activity Cry Consolability Scale after anaesthesia with lidocaine or articaine. Timepoint: During tooth exrtraction. Method of measurement: Face Leg Activity Cry Consolability Scale.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Blood pressure changes before and after tooth extraction. Timepoint: before and after tooth extraction. Method of measurement: Blood prassure monitor.;Pulse rate changes before and after tooth extraction. Timepoint: Before and after tooth extraction. Method of measurement: Pulse Oximeter.