Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05736185
NCT05736185
Completed
Not Applicable

Effect of Electric Impedance Tomography-Guided PEEP Titration on the Ventilation-perfusion Mismatch in Moderate or Severe ARDS

Southeast University, China1 site in 1 country69 target enrollmentFebruary 25, 2023
ConditionsARDS, Human

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
ARDS, Human
Sponsor
Southeast University, China
Enrollment
69
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Difference in ventilation-perfusion mismatch between EIT-PEEP, low-PEEP, and high PEEP
Status
Completed
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

Acute respiratory syndrome distress (ARDS) is a clinical common syndrome with high mortality. Mechanical ventilation (MV) is the cornerstone of management of ARDS but can lead to ventilator-induced lung injury. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), as one of main component of MV, has been widely used in the clinical practice. However, how to best set PEEP is still a difficult problem for moderate to severe ARDS patients. EIT, an imaging tool evaluating the regional ventilation distribution at the bedside, can achieve the individual PEEP selection for all mechanically ventilated patients. This article compared the effect of PEEP titrated guided by EIT with fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2)-PEEP table on the ventilation-perfusion mismatch.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
February 25, 2023
End Date
May 30, 2024
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Crossover
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Southeast University, China
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ling Liu

Director of Intensive Care Unit, Principal Investigator, Clinical Professor

Southeast University, China

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Intubated patients with moderate and severe ARDS (Berlin definition, PaO2/FiO2 ≤200 mmHg at PEEP 5 cmH2O)
  • undergoing deep sedation on controlled mechanical ventilation within72 hours after ARDS onset

Exclusion Criteria

  • age \<18 years old
  • patient undergoing legal protection
  • contra-indications to EIT (e. g. severe chest trauma or wounds)
  • pneumothorax
  • patient undergoing ECMO

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Difference in ventilation-perfusion mismatch between EIT-PEEP, low-PEEP, and high PEEP

Time Frame: up to 24 hours

EIT-PEEP was obtained by EIT, low-PEEP was obtained by low FIO2-PEEP table, and high-PEEP was obtained by high FIO2-PEEP table.

Secondary Outcomes

  • recruitment-to-inflation (R/I) ratio(up to 24 hours)
  • Difference in wasted perfusion measured with EIT between EIT-PEEP, low-PEEP, and high PEEP(up to 24 hours)
  • ventilation distribution measured with EIT between EIT-PEEP, low-PEEP, and high PEEP(up to 24 hours)
  • Correlations between ventilation-perfusion mismatch and overdistension and lung collapses(up to 24 hours)
  • difference in center of ventilation (COV) between EIT-PEEP, low-PEEP, and high PEEP(up to 24 hours)
  • Difference in dead space measured with EIT between EIT-PEEP, low-PEEP, and high PEEP(up to 24 hours)
  • Difference in shunt measured with EIT between EIT-PEEP, low-PEEP, and high PEEP(up to 24 hours)
  • Difference in wasted ventilation measured with EIT between EIT-PEEP, low-PEEP, and high PEEP(up to 24 hours)
  • Correlation between V/Q mismatch markers and recruitability(up to 24 hours)
  • perfusion distribution measured with EIT between EIT-PEEP, low-PEEP, and high PEEP(up to 24 hours)
  • respiratory system mechanics(up to 24 hours)
  • PaO2/FIO2(up to 24 hours)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials