MedPath

Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Periodontal Response to Different Prosthetic Margin Design

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Gingival Disease
Gingival Recession
Gingival Bleeding
Interventions
Procedure: Horizontal Tooth preparation
Procedure: Vertical Tooth preparation
Registration Number
NCT02276586
Lead Sponsor
University of Padova, School of Dental Medicine
Brief Summary

Background: The actual literature is consistent in considering potential negative effects of sub-gingival prosthetic margins on the periodontal health, but no research has focused the attention on the type of prosthetic margin designs. Hence, the aim of the present study is to evaluate if a horizontal finishing line (deep chamfer preparation) may have a different influence on periodontal soft tissue in comparison with a vertical finishing line (feather edge preparation).

Methods: A prospective randomized controlled double blind clinical trial with one single operator and three experienced examiners was performed. One hundred and six crowns were prepared with horizontal tooth preparation while ninety-four with vertical tooth preparation. All the margins were positioned within the periodontal sulcus, at 0.5mm sub-gingivally and all the all-ceramic restorations were cemented with resin cement. Periodontal Probing Depth (PPD), Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI) and Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) were recorded prior to tooth preparation and twelve month after crown cementation. Also, at 12 months follow-up, the gingival margin position was related to the crown margin position.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
58
Inclusion Criteria

The patient inclusion criteria were as follows:

  1. dentate patients treatment planned for single unit restorations in the esthetic zone (from 1st premolar forward)
  2. periodontal probing depth prior to tooth preparation ≤4mm, with no bleeding on probing and no plaque
  3. >30 years of age
  4. full mouth plaque score (FMPS) and full mouth bleeding scores (FMBS) <20% at study baseline
  5. eventual loss of attachment limited only to areas different from the sites included in the study.

The patient exclusion criteria were as follows:

  1. patient with medical history in which any dental intervention would be contraindicated
  2. any local or systemic disease, condition or medication that might compromise healing and affect the periodontium
  3. dental caries or periodontal disease in the remaining teeth
  4. inability or unwillingness to return for follow-up visit.

Exlusion Criteria:

  1. patients with systemic diseases (such as heart, coagulation, and leukocyte diseases or metabolic disorders)
  2. history of radiation therapy in the head and neck region within 12 months prior to surgical phase
  3. current treatment with steroids
  4. neurological or psychiatric condition that could interfere with good oral hygiene
  5. immunocompromised status, including infection with human immunodeficiency virus
  6. smoking habit (more than 10 cigarettes/day)
  7. drug or alcohol abuse
  8. inadequate compliance
  9. patients who received bone regeneration procedure
Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Group 1Horizontal Tooth preparationHorizontal Tooth preparation
Group 2Vertical Tooth preparationVertical tooth preparation
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Periodontal Probing Depth (PPD)Change from Baseline Periodontal Probing Depth (PPD) at 12 months post intervention

Periodontal Probing Depth (PPD) measured at three different facial sites (mesial, facial, distal), with the utilization of a periodontal probe (UNC periodontal probe, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL) recording the measurements to the nearest millimeter.

Plaque Index (PI)Change from Baseline Plaque Index at 12 months post intervention

Plaque Index (PI), according to Silness \& Loe

Gingival Index (GI)Change from Baseline Gingival Index (GI) at 12 months post intervention

Gingival Index (GI), according to Silness \& Loe

Bleeding on Probing (BOP)Change from Baseline Bleeding on Probing (BOP) at 12 months post intervention

Bleeding on Probing (BOP), according to Ainamo \& Bay (presence or absence)

Gingival recession (GR)Change from Baseline Gingival recession (GR) at 12 months post intervention

Gingival margin position related to the crown margin

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Padova

🇮🇹

Padova, PD, Italy

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath