Comparison of the Efficacy of Rhomboid Intercostal Block and Erector Spinal Plane Block on Myofascial Pain Syndrome
- Conditions
- Myofascial Pain Syndrome
- Interventions
- Procedure: Rhomboid intercostal block
- Registration Number
- NCT05073900
- Lead Sponsor
- Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital
- Brief Summary
The investigators evaluate the effect of Ultrasound guided Rhomboid Intercostal Block and Erector Spinal Plane Block on lower cervical and inter scapular Myofascial Pain
- Detailed Description
Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is the most common cause of musculoskeletal pain and its prevalence in the population is reported to be 21-30%. In this study, the investigators compare the effect of two regional anesthesia block techniques with the ultrasound guidance.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
- Complaint of myofascial pain
- Pain that is rated at least 3 on a numerical rating scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = the worst pain)
- pregnancy
- presence of coagulopathy, or the use of anticoagulants
- a history of surgery on the block area
- allergic to bupivacaine
- decline to participate
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Rhomboid intercostal block Rhomboid intercostal block Ultrasound guided rhomboid intercostal block Erector spinae plane block Rhomboid intercostal block Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Change from baseline to minutes 30, day 1, week 1, 2, 4, 6 after the block Pain Score Change The 11-point NRS consists of numbers between 0 and 10 where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "maximum pain." The patient is instructed to identify one number between 0 and 10, which is best representative of their pain intensity.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital
🇹🇷Ankara, Turkey