跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05719090
NCT05719090已完成不适用

Acute Effects of Autoregulated and Non-autoregulated Blood Flow Restrictive Exercise on Indices of Arterial Stiffness

Salisbury University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 20 人开始时间: 2022年10月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
20
试验地点
2
主要终点
Beta-Stiffness Index

研究概览

简要总结

To investigate the acute effects of autoregulated (AR) and non-autoregulated (NAR) BFR exercise on indices of arterial stiffness. AR BFR training devices adjust pressure in the cuff ensuring similar pressure throughout the range of motion when the muscles are contracted (dilatated) and relaxed. NAR BFR training devices do not adjust pressure in the cuff throughout the range of motion when the muscles are contracted and relaxed which cause greater pressures at different points in the range of motion. METHODS: Following a randomized AR or NAR familiarization training session, 20 adults (23±5 years; 7 female) participated in 3 randomized treatment-order sessions with AR-BFR, NAR-BFR, and no- BFR separated by 1-week washout periods. Participants performed 4 sets of dumbbell wall squats to failure using 20% of 1 repetition maximum (1-RM) at 2-second concentric/eccentric cadence. Training limb occlusion pressure (LOP) was set at 60% of supine LOP for both the AT and NAR sessions. Testing before and immediately following the training session included ultrasonography of the carotid artery, applanation tonometry, and blood pressure acquisition. Two-way ANOVAs were used to examine the effects of treatment and the treatment-order interaction on pulse wave velocity (PWV), beta-stiffness index (β-stiff), and arterial compliance (AC). RESULTS: There were no baseline differences in CF- (carotid-femoral) PWV, CR- (carotid-radial) PWV, β-stiff, and AC (all p > 0.05). CF-PWV increased in the NAR-BFR (mean difference = 0.57±1.12 m/s, p = 0.02) and no-BFR (mean difference = 0.63±1.42 m/s, p = 0.03) groups following the exercise session. CR-PWV increased in the no-BFR (mean difference = 0.82±1.5 m/s, p = 0.03) group. And there was an interaction effect in CFPWV between AR-BFR and NAR-BFR (mean difference = 0.70±1.6 m/s, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: These findings show acute AR-BFR training does not influence indices of arterial stiffness while acute NAR-BRF training increases central stiffness.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Basic Science
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 40 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age 18-40 years old
  • Physically active (> 6 months of consistent exercise training)
  • Weight stable for previous 6 months (+/-2.5 kg)
  • Female subjects only- reported regular menstrual cycles for the last 2 years

排除标准

  • BP>140/90 mmHg
  • BMI>40 kg/m2
  • Familial hypercholesterolemia
  • Past or current history of CHD, stroke or major CVD events. Respiratory diseases (not including asthma), endocrine or metabolic, neurological, or hematological disorders that would compromise the study or the health of the subject.
  • Women must not be pregnant, plan to become pregnant during the study, or be nursing
  • Active renal or liver disease
  • All medications and supplements that influence dependent variables
  • Recent surgery < 2 months
  • Alcohol abuse
  • Sleep apnea
  • Claustrophobia

结局指标

主要结局

Beta-Stiffness Index

时间窗: Baseline and 10 minutes after exercise on day 1

A measurement that compares carotid SBP and DBP with carotid systolic and diastole diameters.

Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity

时间窗: Baseline and 10 minutes after exercise on day 1

A measurement that records the time difference between the foot of the systolic wave form as it arrives at the carotid and femoral arterial sites. It is measured with an arterial tonometer.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验