跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05580913
NCT05580913已完成不适用

Auto-regulated Resistance-training for Improving Strength in Older Adults

University of Saskatchewan2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 36 人开始时间: 2022年10月15日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
36
试验地点
2
主要终点
Change from baseline in squat strength

研究概览

简要总结

This research study is comparing the effect of traditional standardized, subjective auto-regulated, and objective auto-regulated resistance training on physiological adaptations and performance measures in adults aged 50 years or older. Traditional standardized resistance training involves prescribing resistance training as a percentage of an individual's one-repetition maximum (i.e., the maximal weight they can lift one time). Auto-regulated resistance training involves adjusting resistance training based on an individual's performance during the session. Subjective auto-regulation involves the resistance trainee providing a subjective rating of perceived exertion based on repetitions in reserve (on a scale from 1 - 10) to adjust the resistance training prescription. A rating of perceived exertion of 10 would mean that the resistance trainee believes that they have provided maximal effort and believes that they could not have performed an additional repetition during the set nor increased the load. Objective auto-regulation involves adjusting the resistance training prescription from a linear position transducer (a device that has a string that attaches to the barbell and provides a velocity value on each repetition). A slower velocity value means a higher perceived exertion and load used, whereas a faster velocity value means a lower perceived exertion and load used.

详细描述

Auto-regulated resistance training has emerged as a resistance training paradigm to individualize programming; however, it remains to be elucidated whether auto-regulated resistance training provides a greater benefit than traditional standardized resistance training on physiological adaptations and performance outcomes in older adults. Traditional resistance training involves prescription of intensity as a percentage of the maximal amount of weight an individual can lift (for example, a resistance of 70% of maximal strength is a weight equal to 70% of the maximal weight a person can lift one time. An individual with this prescription would lift this weight for a number of repetitions to failure; i.e. usually 8-10 repetitions). Auto-regulation can be done two ways: "Subjective" auto-regulation involves lifting a weight for a number of repetitions until the individual reaches a certain "rating of perceived exertion". The rating of perceived exertion is on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the most difficult or maximal exertion. For example, if one was prescribed a rating of perceived exertion of 8 they would lift a weight for a given number of repetitions until they believed they were at an 8/10 on the scale and had 2 repetitions left before failing. "Objective" auto-regulation involves lifting a weight for a given number of repetitions until a predetermined velocity of lifting is reached. For example, once someone starts to get fatigued while performing repeated lifting, the velocity of lifting will slow down. Once they have reached a critical slow velocity, the exercise would be stopped. There is some evidence that auto-regulation improves muscular strength to a greater extent than traditional resistance training in healthy populations.

The research design is a prospective randomized trial comparing three training protocols in 30 participants. Participants will be randomized into one of three groups (n = 10 each), with matching on baseline strength: traditional standardized, subjective auto-regulated, and objective auto-regulated. Training will be twice per week for 12 weeks. Measures include strength assessments, muscle size, and performance of functional tasks.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
50 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Males and females 50 years of age or greater

排除标准

  • Inability to safely perform squat and bench press exercises as determined by the Get Active Questionnaire

结局指标

主要结局

Change from baseline in squat strength

时间窗: baseline, 12 weeks

Change from baseline in bench press strength

时间窗: baseline, 12 weeks

次要结局

  • Change from baseline in time to climb 10 stairs(Baseline, 12 weeks)
  • Change from baseline in muscle thickness(Baseline, 12 weeks)
  • Change from baseline in knee extension strength(Baseline, 12 weeks)
  • Change from baseline for time to sit and stand from a chair five times(Baseline, 12 weeks)
  • Change from baseline in time to complete the "timed up and go" (TUG) test(Baseline, 12 weeks)
  • Change from baseline in time to walk 10 meters(Baseline, 12 weeks)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Phil Chilibeck

Professor

University of Saskatchewan

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验