Deliberate Practice With Validated Metrics Improves Skill Acquisition in Performance of Ultrasound Guided Peripheral Nerve Block in a Simulated Setting
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 18
- 主要终点
- number of steps completed and errors made
研究概览
简要总结
Purpose:
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of deliberate vs. self-guided practices on acquiring needling skills by novice learners.
Methods:
Eighteen medical students were randomized to deliberate or self-guided practices groups. Following a learning phase, subjects attempted to perform a predefined task, which entitled advancing a needle towards a target on a phantom gel under ultrasound guidance. Subsequently, all subjects practiced performing the task using previously validated metrics. Subjects in the deliberate practice group were coached by an expert anesthesiologist and practiced each metric until it was satisfactorily performed based on the supervising anesthesiologist assessment. Immediately after completing the practice, all subjects attempted to perform same task, and on the following day, made two further attempts in succession. Two trained consultant anesthesiologists will use the metrics to independently score the video-recorded performances.
详细描述
Safe performance of ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) requires competence across a range of technical and nontechnical skills. Correct placement of a needle close to a nerve or plexus is critical to safe and successful procedure performance. Failure to maintain needle visibility while in forward motion may cause iatrogenic injury to nerves and surrounding structures, and is a "quality compromising" behavior in the early part of novice learning curve. Skills related to needle guidance are difficult to learn, as they require integration of multiple cognitive and psychomotor elements.
The objective of this study was to compare the effects of expert supervised deliberate practice with validated metrics vs. self-guided practice on novice needling skill acquisition as evaluated by the number of steps completed and errors made.
Methods
Having obtained informed written consent from each, eighteen 3rd and 4th year medical students with no previous experience of ultrasound-guided procedures were recruited. Each student provided demographic information on his or her age, gender and handedness. All subjects will attend a didactic lecture (learning phase) delivered in standard fashion by one investigator. This included outlines of ultrasound physics, scanning and practical techniques.
Subsequently, subjects will be randomly allocated using computer generated random numbers to one of two groups; self-guided practice (SP) and deliberate practice (DP). Approximately 24 hours after completion of the learning phase each subject will attempt to perform the following set of tasks (baseline assessment).
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Other
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •3rd and 4th year medical students
排除标准
- •previous performance of ultrasound guided procedures
研究组 & 干预措施
deliberate practice
expert supervised practice with validated metrics
干预措施: Expert supervised practice with validated metrics (Other)
self-guided practice
self guided practice with validated metrics
干预措施: self guided practice with validated metrics (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
number of steps completed and errors made
时间窗: up to 24 hours
averaged score of the two video assessors is calculated for number of steps completed and error made
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Osman Ahmed
Principal Investigator
University College Cork
