MedPath

Clinical Trial to Improve the Magnetic Levator Prosthesis

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Myasthenia Gravis
Stroke
Ptosis, Eyelid
Blepharoptosis
Traumatic Brain Injury
Interventions
Device: Magnetic Levator Prosthesis (MLP)
Registration Number
NCT03818204
Lead Sponsor
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Brief Summary

Blepharoptosis (incomplete opening of the eyelids) occurs because of a disruption in the normal agonist-antagonist neuro-muscular complex balance. An external device could restore eyelid movement. A newer class of permanent magnets made of alloys of neodymium (Nd), iron (Fe) and boron (B) might provide the technology needed to develop a feasible external magnetic device that could restore eyelid movement.

Detailed Description

Blepharoptosis (incomplete opening of the eyelids) occurs because of a disruption in the normal agonist-antagonist neuro-muscular complex balance. An external device, if able to generate an appropriately balanced force, could restore eyelid movement by performing the paralyzed function; for example, a ptotic (droopy) eyelid could be opened, and the functioning eyelid closure muscle could overcome the device's force (Conway, 1973; Barmettler et. al, 2014; Houston et. al, 2014). Despite this seemingly straight-forward application, permanent magnets for eyelid movement disorders have not thus far become an available treatment. It is possible that earlier magnetic materials lacked the strength (at sizes which were acceptable to patients) to effectively restore the blink, or methods of implantation or external mounting were not effective. A newer class of permanent magnets made of alloys of neodymium (Nd), iron (Fe) and boron (B) might provide the technology needed to develop a feasible external magnetic device. They generate the strongest static magnetic fields yet possible, (1.3T compared to 0.4T of conventional ferrite magnets) (Cyrot, 2005) with exceptional uniaxial magnetocrystalline anisotropy, which makes them resistive to demagnetization (Chikazumui, 1997). The increased magnetic force at a fraction of the size has led to attempts for other medical applications including implantation for gastroesophageal reflux disease (Ganz, 2013), in dental prosthetics (Uribe, 2006), ocular reconstructive surgery (de Negreiros, 2012), and glaucoma (Paschalis et. al, 2013). Problems with extended external non-surgical adhesion to the skin of the eyelid may be solved with hydrocolloid-based medical adhesives e.g. Tegaderm™ (Chen, 1997), already used for IV catheter securement, wound dressing, and as a protective eye covering (FDA, 1997). This material is extremely thin, transparent, and oxygen permeable with an established safety profile for days to weeks of wear. The hydrophyllic properties (FDA, 1997) may be beneficial to the eyelids, which are often moist. In our prior work we established proof-of-concept data demonstrating safety and efficacy for temporary management ptosis up to 2 hour per day for 2 weeks. Due to the sensitive force distance relationship characteristics of magnetic fields and variable nature of ptosis (often worsens throughout the day) the MLP required frequent readjustment and consistent correction was difficult to achieve. Other challenges included lid redness with longer wear times (in the participants who wore the MLP longer than instructed), incomplete spontaneous blinking, and difficultly with self-application of the magnetic lid array to the eye lid. This study aims to address these challenges. In order to improve the MLP we will determine the range of force in the target severe ptosis population to open the lid and where blinking is inhibited, determine the best polarity combination between the lid magnets and the spectacle magnet, determine if rotating the spectacle magnet is a good method to allow simple force adjustment via a dial on the side of the frame, determine if custom made frames improve stability of the frame, and create an applicator tool to help participants apply the lid magnet themselves.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
17
Inclusion Criteria
  • Experimental:
  • Presence of ptosis for at least one eye which obscures the visual axis in the resting position (without frontalis drive, lifting with forehead muscles)
  • Moderate cognitive function or better defined as greater than or equal to 18 out of 30 on a pre-screening of the Mini-Mental State Exam
  • Age 5 or older
  • Control/Normal Vision Group:
  • Absence of ptosis which obscures the visual axis
  • Age 18 or older
Exclusion Criteria
  • Experimental:
  • Absence of blepharoptosis or presence of a corneal ulcer.
  • Those with a corneal ulcer are at risk for permanent loss of vision and should be managed with proven methods.
  • Age less than 5,
  • Severe Cognitive impairment defined as MMSE score <18, behaviors consistent with delirium (combinations of disorientation, hallucinations, delusions, and incoherent speech), or lethargy. These individuals must be excluded since participation requires competent self-care, reliable responses and cooperation during fitting of the devices.
  • Control/Normal Vision Group:
  • Presence of Blepharoptosis
  • Age less than 18

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Control/Normal Vision GroupMagnetic Levator Prosthesis (MLP)The purpose of the normal vision group is to test the experimental setup prior to enrolling ptosis patients. If the measurements of the normal vision group are found to be non-different to the experimental group, the data will be pooled. -Intervention - Magnetic Levator Prosthesis (MLP)
Experimental GroupMagnetic Levator Prosthesis (MLP)The purpose of the experimental group is to test the intervention. Participants will have their acuity measured (refraction as needed), slit lamp with Nafl \& NEI scale, visual functioning questionnaire (VFQ), cognitive assessment (MOCA).The eye lid will be prepped and video recorded.The masked clinical staff will then apply the polarized magnets and perform a number of measurements to ascertain effectiveness of intervention. -Intervention - Magnetic Levator Prosthesis (MLP)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in interpalpebral fissure during eye openingThis outcome will be analysed by reviewing video recording. Video recording will be performed 7 times for the duration of the study (4 videos performed during visit 1; 3 video performed during visit 2)

A \> 1mm change in interpalpebral fissure (resting open) at min and max force of the rotatable system; a \>1mm change in interpalpebral fissure when the lid array is polarized through thickness as compared to through height.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in interpalpebral fissure during the blinkVideo recording will be performed 7 times for the duration of the study (4 videos performed during visit 1; 3 video performed during visit 2)

Video analysis to measure the completeness of eye closure with the MLP compared to 1) no device, 2) relative to the contralateral side (if normal), 3) relative to different configurations of the device and custom vs. non-custom frames.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Schepens Eye Research Institute

🇺🇸

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath