跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06718322
NCT06718322Enrolling By Invitation不适用

Towards Large-Scale Adaptation and Tailored Implementation of Primary Cancer Prevention Programs Across 9 Countries

Hidde van der Ploeg11 个研究点 分布在 9 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2024年12月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
Enrolling By Invitation
发起方
入组人数
100
试验地点
11
主要终点
Competencies in Implementation

研究概览

简要总结

The PIECES project aims to evaluate the Primary Cancer Prevention Implementation Toolkit (PCP-IT), an online implementation support toolkit that aids implementation teams in improving the implementation of primary cancer prevention programs (PCPs).

The primary aim of the PIECES study is to support and learn from the process of selecting, adapting, and implementing existing evidence-based programs to improve implementation outcomes and by that, improve the reach and effectiveness of primary cancer prevention programmes in real-world settings.

The study objectives are:

  1. To assess whether the PCP-IT is usable and if implementation teams are satisfied with the tool;
  2. To assess what works for whom in using the PCP-IT for selecting, adapting, and implementing PCP programs;
  3. To assess whether the PCP-IT is feasible and effective in improving acceptability, adoption, penetration, and sustainable implementation of the PCP programs.

The PCP-IT will be used by various implementation settings across 9 countries (8 European countries and Australia). A multi-site case comparison design is used to generate in-depth knowledge about the performance and working mechanisms of the PCP-IT. Similarities, differences, and patterns across the different implementation sites will be investigated using a Realist Evaluation approach.

详细描述

A range of modifiable factors are associated with cancer incidence among the population of the European Union (EU) and beyond. These include: 1) tobacco smoking and exposure to second-hand smoke, 2) alcohol consumption, 3) poor physical activity, 4) HPV infection, 5) sun exposure, and 6) poor diet. Various Primary Cancer Prevention (PCP) programs are currently available to address these risk factors with proven effectiveness. Decision-makers and implementers face the challenge of: 1) selecting appropriate and suitable programs, 2) tailoring the programs to the local context and consulting stakeholders, and 3) developing a tailored plan (i.e., strategies) for effectively implementing the selected and adapted PCP program. The lack of guidance and support for this complex and time-consuming process leads to two undesired outcomes: 1) the selection of ineffective or poorly adapted PCP programs, and 2) the application of ineffective implementation strategies that do not target local and context-dependent barriers to implementation. These scenarios are likely to reduce the effectiveness of primary cancer prevention programs in real-world settings, leading to inefficiencies and failing to prevent new cancer cases.

The PIECES project involves the development and evaluation of an online implementation support toolkit (the Primary Cancer Prevention Implementation Toolkit (PCP-IT)). The PCP-IT aims to support implementation teams in improving the implementation of primary cancer prevention programs (PCPs). The PCP-IT builds upon the theory-base and the proven to be effective ItFits tool. The PCP-IT encompasses a total of six modules. The modules are designed to guide implementers through the process of selecting and adapting PCP programs, identifying and addressing barriers, and developing and applying tailored implementation strategies. The core resources contributing to the generative mechanisms of the toolkit include: 1) a repository of primary cancer prevention programs, 2) a repository of determinants of practice, 3) a repository of implementation strategies, 4) stakeholder consultation at all stages, 5) an online community of implementation practitioners, and 6) structured stepped process flows, instructions, examples and worksheets for working with the materials.

In the PIECES study, a multi-site case comparison design is chosen to generate in-depth knowledge about the performance and working mechanisms of the PCP-IT. Similarities, differences, and patterns across the cases (i.e. different implementation settings) will be investigated using a Realist Evaluation approach. A pre/post-test measure will be applied to descriptively assess implementation outcomes. A time horizon of two years is selected to assess change over time.

The PCP-IT will be used in various countries and implementation settings, aiming for a rich representation of healthcare systems (Spain, the Netherlands, Albania, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Italy, Ukraine, Germany (3 settings), and Australia).

Within each implementation site, different types of participants with specific roles can be distinguished:

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •User of the PCP-IT, involved in implementation of PCP programs.

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究组 & 干预措施

Local implementation teams

Experimental

The local implementation teams for this study, referred to as the implementers of the Primary Cancer Prevention Implementation Toolkit (PCP-IT), are the primary users of the toolkit and play a central role in tailoring and implementing cancer prevention interventions. Each team is responsible for selecting and adapting the intervention to meet local needs and developing a tailored implementation plan. Each team is led by an implementation lead, who directly oversees the implementation process and ensures the team effectively uses the PCP-IT to guide their work. In some cases, the implementation lead may also serve as the implementation coordinator. The coordinator's role is to provide higher-level oversight and may involve coordinating multiple implementation teams across various locations, such as hospitals, or focusing on a single team at one site.

干预措施: Primary Cancer Prevention Implementation Toolkit (PCP-IT) (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Competencies in Implementation

时间窗: Month 0, repeated every six months until month 24.

Participants are asked to rate how skilled they feel in various implementation competencies. Respondents evaluate their skills for each item on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from not at all to extremely (not at all, slightly, moderately, very, extremely).

次要结局

  • Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC)(Month 0, repeated every six months until month 24.)
  • Perceived Ease of Use(Month 6, repeated every six months until month 24.)
  • Perceived Usefulness(Month 6, repeated every six months until month 24.)
  • Satisfaction with the PCP-IT(Month 6, repeated every six months until month 24.)
  • Perceived impact of the PCP-IT(Month 6, repeated every six months until month 24.)
  • Behavioral Intention(Month 6, repeated every six months until month 24.)

研究者

发起方
Hidde van der Ploeg
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Hidde van der Ploeg

Professor

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

研究点 (11)

Loading locations...

相似试验