Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02076958
NCT02076958
Completed
Not Applicable

Implementation of Evidence-Based Cancer Early Detection in Black Churches

University of Maryland, College Park1 site in 1 country457 target enrollmentMarch 2011

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Information Dissemination
Sponsor
University of Maryland, College Park
Enrollment
457
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Adherence to program delivery protocol - Implementation of the 3-workshop series.
Status
Completed
Last Updated
3 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of the proposed project is to identify an optimal implementation strategy using a set of evidence-based interventions that aim to increase early detection of breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer among African Americans as a model. These three interventions will be packaged and interwoven into a single branded project, Project HEAL (Health through Early Awareness and Learning) which will be delivered through trained Community Health Advisors (CHA) in African-American church settings. The implementation and sustainability will be evaluated using the RE-AIM Framework. Fourteen African American churches in Prince George's County, MD will be randomized to a traditional classroom training approach or an online training approach, in which the CHA training approach and level of technical assistance is varied (in-person classroom training of CHAs + monitoring/evaluation + technical assistance and training vs. online training of CHAs + monitoring and evaluation only, respectively). By varying the training methodology and level of technical assistance, we will be able to determine what level of technical assistance leads to successful implementation and sustainability. We will also identify church organizational capacity characteristics that lead to successful implementation and sustainability. The specific aims of this research are to: (1) Package the three interventions into a single branded project (Project HEAL), develop a local cancer screening resource guide, and pilot test the materials and training. (2) Implement Project HEAL in 14 churches in Prince George's County, Maryland. We will evaluate the implementation outcomes involving treatment fidelity and identify church organizational capacity characteristics that led to successful implementation. We will compare the two implementation strategies (traditional vs. online) to determine the optimal level of technical assistance necessary for successful implementation. (3) Evaluate the sustainability of Project HEAL over a two-year period of time. We will identify church organizational capacity characteristics that led to sustainability, and compare the two implementation strategies (traditional vs. online) to determine the optimal level of technical assistance for successful sustainability.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
March 2011
End Date
October 2018
Last Updated
3 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Workshop participants: Men and women who have had breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Adherence to program delivery protocol - Implementation of the 3-workshop series.

Time Frame: Up to 10 months

Secondary Outcomes

  • Number of training events (workshops)(Up to 10 months)
  • Change in perceived barriers to screening(Up to 10 months)
  • Completion of CHA training(Baseline)
  • Self-report of modifications or problems with program delivery(Up to 12 months)
  • Number of booster CHA training sessions over two-year period(12-month; 24-month)
  • Ratings of program(Up to 10 months)
  • Number of participants that attended educational sessions(Up to 10 months)
  • Enrollment of churches(Baseline)
  • Number of continued health education activities including cancer education over two year period(12-month; 24-month)
  • Number of CHA trainees(Baseline)
  • Change in perceived benefits of screening(Up to 10 months)
  • Change in number of survey completion from baseline to 12-month to 24-month(Baseline; 12-month; 24-month)
  • Amount of supplemental funding church receives for additional health education over two years(12-month; 24-month)
  • Number of educational sessions participants attended(Up to 10 months)
  • Change in knowledge of cancer early detection from workshop 1 to workshop 3(Up to 10 months)
  • Change in self-efficacy for screening(Up to 10 months)
  • Change in self-report of screening from baseline to 12-month to 24-month(Baseline; 12-month; 24-month)
  • Percent of eligible congregation that enrolled in the project(Baseline)
  • Number of additional training cycles completed over two year period(12-months; 24-months)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials