Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04631809
NCT04631809
Completed
Not Applicable

Computer tomoGRaphy guidEd invasivE Coronary Angiography in patiEnts With a Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trial

University Hospital of Patras1 site in 1 country225 target enrollmentOctober 30, 2020

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Sponsor
University Hospital of Patras
Enrollment
225
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Total volume of contrast administered
Status
Completed
Last Updated
3 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This randomized, multi-center, prospective study seeks to compare the conventional invasive Coronary Angiography with the recently described method of performing CT-Coronary Angiography prior to the invasive Coronary Angiography, in post - CABG patients subjected to coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention.

Detailed Description

Conventional invasive coronary angiography is currently used to depict coronary arteries, however in recent years, the use of CT-coronary angiography has emerged in the literature for being a non-invasive and well tolerated examination, with imaging findings often equivalent to standard coronary angiography, especially for imaging grafts in patients undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). These patients present with complex anatomy of the coronary arteries making invasive coronary angiography a demanding and time-consuming examination in which the patient is exposed to large doses of radiation and volume of contrast. Multislice computed tomography shows high diagnostic accuracy in the detection of obstruction of the grafts while the advancement of technology continuously improves the diagnostic accuracy of the imaging findings. Of course, axial coronary angiography is more sensitive and specialized in the imaging of grafts, compared to the native coronary arteries of the heart. Therefore, the use of CT-coronary angiography before performing the respective invasive procedure is believed that it may reduce the overall duration of the procedure, the radiation received by the patient and the amount of contrast administered. The aim of the present study is to compare the performance of CT-coronary angiography before invasive coronary angiography compared with the performance of invasive coronary angiography alone. Τhe extent to which the information obtained from CT-coronary angiography contributes to the guidance of invasive coronary angiography that will follow will be studied, regarding the total procedure time, the volume of the contrast administered the radiation to which the patient is exposed and the patient's course over a period of 30 days.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
October 30, 2020
End Date
November 30, 2022
Last Updated
3 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
University Hospital of Patras
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Grigorios Tsigkas

assistant Professor of Cardiology

University Hospital of Patras

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Prior CABG-operation
  • Age\>18 years
  • Indication for coronary angiography
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • NSTEMI very high risk or high risk (GRACE score \>140, dynamic new ST/T ECG changes)
  • Hemodynamic instability
  • High probability of patient's non-compliance with the study's procedures.
  • Severe kidney disease with GFR\<30 mL/min/1.73m2
  • Known allergic reaction to contrast
  • Uncontrolled Arrhythmias (mostly afib) with heart rate over 80 bpm or frequent ectopic beats which could affect the ECG-gated cCTA protocol.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Total volume of contrast administered

Time Frame: Immediately post-procedurally

Secondary Outcomes

  • Number of catheters used(Immediately post-procedurally)
  • Total Procedure time (coronary angiography and possible angioplasty)(Immediately post-procedurally)
  • Rate of complications related to coronary angiography (aortic dissection, coronary artery dissection, stroke, bleeding, puncture site complication)(1-6 hours)
  • Overall diagnostic accuracy of CTCA for estimation of graft patency will be measured, using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value.(Immediately post-procedurally)
  • Total Radiation Dose (Effective Dose) during coronary angiography(Immediately post-procedurally)
  • Total Fluoroscopy time(Immediately post-procedurally)
  • Number of catheters used during coronary angiography(Immediately post-procedurally)
  • Total Radiation Dose (Effective Dose)(Immediately post-procedurally)
  • Patient survival after procedure and occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). (Death, hospitalization for cardiovascular reason, re-infarction, need for revascularization, stroke).(30 days)
  • Rate of patient survival after procedure and occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). (Death, hospitalization for cardiovascular reason, re-infarction, need for revascularization, stroke)(3-5 days)
  • Rate of contrast induced nephropathy defined as increase of serum Cr of 25% or more, or an absolute increase of 0.5 mg/dl or more from baseline value, at 48-72 h following the exposure to contrast medium.(3-5 days)
  • Total volume of contrast agent administered during coronary angiography(Immediately post-procedurally)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials