跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01080599
NCT01080599已完成不适用

Comparison of the Success Rate of Two Approaches for Obturator Nerve Block in TURB (Conventional Pubic Approach [Labat Technique] and Inguinal Approach)

Yonsei University0 个研究点目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2009年6月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
100
主要终点
Assessment of obturator sign during using nerve stimulator and operation

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to compare the success rate of two approaches for obturator nerve block in TURB (conventional pubic approach [Labat technique] and inguinal approach.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Scheduled to undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumor during combined spinal anesthesia and obturator nerve block were included in the clinical study

排除标准

  • Patients with advanced cardiac and respiratory insufficiency
  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • Preexisting neurologic deficits
  • Prior operation involving the hip and the inguinal region and bleeding tendency were excluded.

结局指标

主要结局

Assessment of obturator sign during using nerve stimulator and operation

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other

相似试验