Comparing the time taken for securing the airway through Channelled and Unchannelled Blades of King Vision Videolaryngoscope
Phase 4
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/07/069727
- Lead Sponsor
- niversity college of medical sciences and GTB hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
ASA grade I and II with Modified Mallampati grade I and II with mouth opening more than 3cm with BMI less than 30 kg per m2 scheduled for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia
Exclusion Criteria
1 Obstetric patients
2 Anticipated difficult airway example unanticipated difficult airway in the medical history for example Cormack and Lehane grade more than or equal to III or Airway Difficulty Score more than 8
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time taken for intubation through King Vision channelled blade Videolaryngoscope and King Vision Unchannelled blade Videolaryngoscope <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>Timepoint: Once,from inserting the Videolaryngoscope into the oral cavity till the confirmation of endotracheal intubation by using square wave form capnography in monitor
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1 CL grade of laryngeal view <br/ ><br>2 POGO Score <br/ ><br>3 Time to vocal cord view <br/ ><br>4 Number of intubation attempts <br/ ><br>5 Hemodynamic parameters during laryngoscopy in both the groups <br/ ><br>6 Intubation difficulty score <br/ ><br>7 Ease of Intubation <br/ ><br>8 Complications or any Technical problems <br/ ><br>Timepoint: Hemodynamic parameters during laryngoscopy in both the groups will be recorded at Baseline and immediate after induction of anaesthesia and post intubation at 1min 3min and 5min