Endotracheal Intubation in Prehospital Scenario
- Conditions
- Endotracheal Intubation
- Interventions
- Device: C-MAC laryngoscopeDevice: Macintosh laryngoscope
- Registration Number
- NCT02681835
- Lead Sponsor
- Medical University of Warsaw
- Brief Summary
We therefore designed this randomized crossover study to compare C-MAC with Macintosh laryngoscope in emergency intubation performed by paramedics according to three different intubator positions.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 78
- give voluntary consent to participate in the study
- maximum 1 year of work experience in medicine
- minimum 50 clinical intubations
- paramedics
- not meet the above criteria
- wrist or low back diseases
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Position 2 Macintosh laryngoscope Intubator is behind head of the victim, lies on the left side Position 1 C-MAC laryngoscope Standard position during intubation. Intubator is behind head of the victim, propped up on both elbows Position 3 C-MAC laryngoscope Intubator stands astride the victims, intubated using the face-to-face Position 1 Macintosh laryngoscope Standard position during intubation. Intubator is behind head of the victim, propped up on both elbows Position 2 C-MAC laryngoscope Intubator is behind head of the victim, lies on the left side Position 3 Macintosh laryngoscope Intubator stands astride the victims, intubated using the face-to-face
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time required for successful intubation 1 day
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method cumulative success ratios related to time 1 day cumulative success ratio was counted as percentage of successful intubations in time intervals in all scenarios
Cormack&Lehane grade 1 day glottic view during intubation rate using Cormack\&Lehane grade
Dental Compression 1 day the severity of the potential dental trauma was calculated based on previously described modified grading scale (Svoldelli, 2009)
Ease of intubation 1 day To access subjective opinion about the difficulty of each intubation method, participants were asked to rate it on a visual analog scale (VAS) with a score from 1 (extremely easy) to 10 (extremely difficult).
success rate of intubation attempt 1 day success rate of first, second and third intubation attempt
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Medical University of Warsaw, Department of Emergency Medicine
🇵🇱Warsaw, Masovia, Poland