MedPath

Endotracheal Intubation in Prehospital Scenario

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Endotracheal Intubation
Interventions
Device: C-MAC laryngoscope
Device: Macintosh laryngoscope
Registration Number
NCT02681835
Lead Sponsor
Medical University of Warsaw
Brief Summary

We therefore designed this randomized crossover study to compare C-MAC with Macintosh laryngoscope in emergency intubation performed by paramedics according to three different intubator positions.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
78
Inclusion Criteria
  • give voluntary consent to participate in the study
  • maximum 1 year of work experience in medicine
  • minimum 50 clinical intubations
  • paramedics
Exclusion Criteria
  • not meet the above criteria
  • wrist or low back diseases

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Position 2Macintosh laryngoscopeIntubator is behind head of the victim, lies on the left side
Position 1C-MAC laryngoscopeStandard position during intubation. Intubator is behind head of the victim, propped up on both elbows
Position 3C-MAC laryngoscopeIntubator stands astride the victims, intubated using the face-to-face
Position 1Macintosh laryngoscopeStandard position during intubation. Intubator is behind head of the victim, propped up on both elbows
Position 2C-MAC laryngoscopeIntubator is behind head of the victim, lies on the left side
Position 3Macintosh laryngoscopeIntubator stands astride the victims, intubated using the face-to-face
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time required for successful intubation1 day
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
cumulative success ratios related to time1 day

cumulative success ratio was counted as percentage of successful intubations in time intervals in all scenarios

Cormack&Lehane grade1 day

glottic view during intubation rate using Cormack\&Lehane grade

Dental Compression1 day

the severity of the potential dental trauma was calculated based on previously described modified grading scale (Svoldelli, 2009)

Ease of intubation1 day

To access subjective opinion about the difficulty of each intubation method, participants were asked to rate it on a visual analog scale (VAS) with a score from 1 (extremely easy) to 10 (extremely difficult).

success rate of intubation attempt1 day

success rate of first, second and third intubation attempt

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Medical University of Warsaw, Department of Emergency Medicine

🇵🇱

Warsaw, Masovia, Poland

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath