Comparison of efficacy of two surgical techniques used for treatment of receding gums.
Not Applicable
Completed
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2014/03/004488
- Lead Sponsor
- Manipal college of dental sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 20
Inclusion Criteria
1) Patients with Miller class I gingival recession on canines and pre molar on the maxilla.
2) Normal alignment of tooth in arch
3) Patients who can maintain good oral hygiene
Exclusion Criteria
1) Presence of root caries
2) Smokers and tobacco chewers
3) Systemically compromised
4) History of previous periodontal surgery
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method amount of recession coverage, probing depth, attachment level. keratinized tissue height and width of attached gingivaTimepoint: The outcome will be estimated at 3 months and 6 months following the procedure
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Post operative discomfort using visual analogue scaleTimepoint: At 2 weeks and one month