Evaluation of the Impact of the PRONEtect Education Hub vs. Classic Lecture, on the Competencies of Nursing Students
- Conditions
- Pressure UlcerProne Position
- Interventions
- Other: (online) PRONEtect educational materialOther: Classic (normal) one hour lesson/lecture
- Registration Number
- NCT05575869
- Lead Sponsor
- University Ghent
- Brief Summary
The goal of this randomised controlled trial is to compare the impact of online educational material versus a classic lecture on the confidence levels, knowledge and knowledge application of final-year nursing students.
Participants will be asked to complete a baseline self-efficacy evaluation and a baseline knowledge test which were validated by the 11-member international expert panel previously established.
After randomization, the control group will be asked to attend a classic 1-hour lecture at the nursing school about the topic of prone positioning and skin/tissue damage prevention.
The experimental group will get access to the PRONEtect educational website containing short simulation videos and other learning materials.
Three weeks later the participants will be asked to complete the self-efficacy evaluation and knowledge assessment again, additionally a knowledge application assessment.
All the questionnaires will be administered via Qualtrics.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 80
- Final year nursing students studying towards their Bachelor in Nursing degree
- Chosen topics of critical care nursing as supplementary subject or critical care subjects as part of their course or complex wound management as part of their course.
Nursing students who are not yet in their final year of studies.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Experimental group: Access to online PRONEtect educational material (online) PRONEtect educational material A website with educational material (simulation video, protocol, checklist). Control group: Classic one-hour lecture Classic (normal) one hour lesson/lecture Didactive presentation by the usual nursing school lecturer.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Knowledge assessment (test score) 3 weeks A total sample size of 78 participants (39 in each group, 1:1 allocation ratio) to have at least 80% power to demonstrate non-inferiority of the online package (experimental group) compared to the classical lecture (control group) with respect to the mean change from baseline in knowledge at week 3 at the one-sided 1.25% significance level, when the non-inferiority margin is set at 1 point and when we assume a common standard deviation in both groups of 2.5 points, a true difference between the groups of 1 point in favor of the online package, and a drop-out rate of 20%.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Difference between the "Knowledge application" (test score) between the groups 3 weeks Difference between the "Knowledge application" (test score) of 1-2 points between the groups
Confidence levels (survey scores) 3 weeks A total sample size of 78 participants (39 in each group, 1:1 allocation ratio) to have at least 80% power to demonstrate non-inferiority of the online package (experimental group) compared to the classical lecture (control group) with respect to the mean change from baseline in knowledge at week 3 at the one-sided 1.25% significance level, when the non-inferiority margin is set at 1 point and when we assume a common standard deviation in both groups of 2.5 points, a true difference between the groups of 1 point in favor of the online package, and a drop-out rate of 20%.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Ghent University
🇧🇪Ghent, Belgium