MedPath

Comparing Relative Motion Splint and Metacarpophalangeal Joint Blocking Splint for Trigger Finger

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Trigger Finger
Stenosing Tenosynovitis
Interventions
Other: Relative Motion Splint
Other: Metacarpophalangeal Joint Blocking Splint
Registration Number
NCT05763017
Lead Sponsor
National University of Malaysia
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of relative motion splint and metacarpophalangeal joint blocking splints in terms of sign and symptoms, hand function, occupational performance, and perception of splint wearability (comfort and satisfaction) after six weeks of TF management.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
42
Inclusion Criteria
  • single or multiple trigger finger
  • unilateral or bilateral trigger finger
  • neutral metacarpophalangeal joint position can be attained during passive isolated metacarpophalangeal joint extension of the affected finger
Exclusion Criteria
  • trigger thumb
  • steroid injection of the affected finger within last six months
  • A1 pulley release of the affected finger.
  • history of fracture, tendon injury, nerve injury, Dupuytren's contracture, and other soft tissue injuries of the affected finger or adjacent fingers.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Relative Motion SplintRelative Motion SplintIn the relative motion splint, the metacarpophalangeal joint of the affected finger(s) positioned in approximately 20°-25° more extension/flexion than metacarpophalangeal joint of the adjacent fingers.
Metacarpophalangeal Joint Blocking SplintMetacarpophalangeal Joint Blocking SplintIn the metacarpophalangeal joint blocking splint, the metacarpophalangeal joint of the affected finger(s) positioned in 0°.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Stages of Stenosing Tenosynovitis (SST)Baseline, 6 weeks after splint wear

SST is a grading system that divides trigger finger into six stages. Stage 1 is normal; Stage 2 is uneven finger movement; Stage 3 is triggering or clicking or catching; Stage 4 is locking of finger in flexion or extension, which can be unlocked by active finger movement; Stage 5 is locking of finger in flexion or extension, which requires application of passive force to unlock; and Stage 6 is locked finger in flexion or extension

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for painBaseline, 6 weeks after splint wear

The left end of the VAS labelled as "no pain" and the right end labelled as "extreme pain".

Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Outcome MeasureBaseline, 6 weeks after splint wear

DASH is a 30-item, self-report questionnaire that range from 0-100 score, with higher scores represent more severe disability or poorer hand function.

Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)Baseline, 6 weeks after splint wear

COPM is a interview-based assessment tool for measuring occupational performance. The importance, satisfaction, and performance of an activity are rated using a 10-point rating scale.

Number of triggering events in ten active fistsBaseline, 6 weeks after splint wear

The number of triggering events (0 - 10) can be obtained by asking the patient to make 10 active full fists.

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for splint comfortBaseline, 3 and 6 weeks after splint wear

The left end of the VAS labelled as "not at all comfortable' and the right end labelled as "extremely comfortable".

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for splint satisfactionBaseline, 3 and 6 weeks after splint wear

The left end of the VAS labelled as "not at all satisfied" and the right end labelled as "extremely satisfied".

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hospital Sultan Haji Ahmad Shah

🇲🇾

Temerluh, Pahang, Malaysia

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath