From Innovation to Solutions: Childhood Influenza Vaccination Planning
- Conditions
- Influenza
- Interventions
- Behavioral: 4 Pillars Immunization Toolkit
- Registration Number
- NCT01664793
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Pittsburgh
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to increase childhood influenza vaccination rates using the FDA licensed influenza vaccines according to national guidelines in a randomized cluster trial in which primary care offices are randomized to intervention or control with the control group receiving the intervention in the second year.
- Detailed Description
The investigators will conduct a stratified, randomized cluster trial of 20 diverse primary care practices to compare influenza vaccination rates in intervention and control sites. Intervention sites will use a package of newly developed and evidence-based techniques that will be tailored to their practice structure and culture, called the 4 Pillars Immunization Toolkit, in addition to receiving donated vaccine for early season vaccination. Control practices will not receive such assistance but will receive the intervention in the second year.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 87665
Not provided
For children: Severe egg allergy or allergy to influenza vaccine
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Intervention Group Year 1 4 Pillars Immunization Toolkit The 4 Pillars Immunization Toolkit along with donated vaccines for early season vaccination, staff education and support.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Primary Outcome 3/1/2011-2/29/2012 Influenza vaccination rates in each arm at the end of year 1
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Effectiveness Score End of February 2012 Two staff members from each site were surveyed as to usefulness/effectiveness of a list of strategies recommended in the toolkit to increase vaccination rates. Values (range = 1-100 with 1 being not at all effective and 100 being highly effective) were averaged and used as an effectiveness score for each strategy. The average value for each site was combined with all sites and averaged for each strategy. (actual range = 20.6-90.7).
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Deparment of Family Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology
🇺🇸Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States