MedPath

Analytical Performances and Clinical Impact of the Roche Cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV Assay in the Management of Adult and Pediatric Patients Attending the Emergency Room

Not Applicable
Terminated
Conditions
RSV Infection
Influenza Viral Infections
Registration Number
NCT05105191
Lead Sponsor
Erasme University Hospital
Brief Summary

Molecular techniques for respiratory virus detection have already shown benefits in terms of sensitivity gained in comparison to conventional techniques. Recent progress has made it possible to shorten turnaround time (TAT) and to allow delivery of results in a timely manner, especially in comparison to cell culture and direct fluorescence assays (DFA). However, the cost of these molecular assays is usually not taken in charge by public health insurance system. This could be partly explained by the fact that molecular techniques have not clearly shown cost-effectiveness. Results of molecular tests for influenza viruses and RSV, if delivered rapidly, in the emergency room (ER), would most likely help avoid antibiotic use and ancillary test prescription, improve antiviral prescription and shorten length of stay in the ward by facilitating discharge or cohorting of hospitalized patients. The goal of this study is to assess the performances of Roche Cobas® Liat Influenza A/B \& RSV assay, to appraise its clinical impact and to evaluate its cost effectiveness.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
280
Inclusion Criteria
  • Either a pre-test indication of hospitalization
  • or an underlying situation at risk of respiratory complication following influenza infection
Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Analytical performance (Sensitivity/Specificity)through study completion, 6 months

Calculation of sensitivity and specificity of the test versus a composite reference standard. Samples are considered as positive for a viral pathogen if testing positive for this viral pathogen by at least 2 of the 3 techniques used, negative if tested negative by at least 2 of the 3 techniques (culture, antigen detection and PCR test).

Hospital admission intentionsthrough study completion, 6 months

Number of admission intentions before and after the test result

Isolation intentionsthrough study completion, 6 months

Number of isolation intentions before and after the test result

Antibiotic prescription intentionsthrough study completion, 6 months

Number of antibiotic prescription intentions before and after the test result

Antiviral treatment prescription intentionsthrough study completion, 6 months

Number of antiviral treatments prescription intentions before and after the test result

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (4)

Erasme Hospital

🇧🇪

Brussels, Belgium

Brugmann Hospital

🇧🇪

Brussels, Belgium

Saint-Pierre Hospital

🇧🇪

Brussels, Belgium

HUDERF

🇧🇪

Brussels, Belgium

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath