Study on influence that difference in fresh gas flow quantity in the general anesthesia gives to desflurane and carbon dioxide absorbent cost
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Oto-rhino-laryngologic surgery
- Registration Number
- JPRN-UMIN000025140
- Lead Sponsor
- Keio University school of medicine
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete: follow-up complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 70
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
ASA-PS is more than 3 Patient with the past of the malignant hyperthermia
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Total use time per one soda lime in each group.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The number of anesthesia that reached with one soda lime. Consumption of desflurane in each group. Cost of desflurane in each group.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What is the economic impact of varying fresh gas flow rates on desflurane and CO2 absorbent costs in general anesthesia for oto-rhino-laryngologic surgery?
How does adjusting fresh gas flow rates influence the efficiency of desflurane use and CO2 absorbent consumption in general anesthesia for ENT surgeries?
Are there specific patient biomarkers that predict cost savings from optimized fresh gas flow in desflurane-based general anesthesia for ENT procedures?
What are the potential adverse events associated with low fresh gas flow rates in desflurane anesthesia for oto-rhino-laryngologic surgeries and how are they managed?
How do the cost-effectiveness outcomes of desflurane compare to sevoflurane under different fresh gas flow rates in ENT surgical anesthesia?