Evaluation of the Detection of Atrial Fibrillation by a Wearable Dynamic ECG Recorder
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Interventions
- Device: Wearable Dynamic ECG RecorderDevice: 12-lead ECG recordings
- Registration Number
- NCT04462653
- Lead Sponsor
- Huami Corporation
- Brief Summary
A Randomized, Crossover Trial is conducted to Evaluate Consistency Atrial fibrillation diagnosis between the Wearable Dynamic ECG Recorder and the Control device.
In this investigation, the following indicators is also evaluated:
1. Sensitivity and specificity of the ECG App algorithm in detecting atrial fibrillation compared with physician-adjudicated Gold Standard ECG recorder.
2. Waveform qualitative assessment
3. Safety incident assessments. 114 subjects (60 healthy subjects in phase I and 54 subjects with atrial fibrillation diagnosis in phase II) are enrolled in the investigation according to the criteria.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 114
-
- All study participants must be able to provide written informed consent prior to study procedure. This study has 2 Phases.
Phase 1:
- Health conscious individuals
- > 18 years of age
Phase 2:
- > 18 years of age
- non critical patients ever diagnosed with atrial fibrillation
-
• < 18 years old
- Unable to consent
Phase 1:
- > 80 years of age
- Previous history of cardiac disease (e.g., atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure)
- current status of non-sinus heart rhythm
Phase 2:
- Critical patients
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description use two kinds of device successively Wearable Dynamic ECG Recorder the same participant use a Wearable Dynamic ECG Recorder and 12-lead ECG to record heart rate and atrial fibrillation use two kinds of device successively 12-lead ECG recordings the same participant use a Wearable Dynamic ECG Recorder and 12-lead ECG to record heart rate and atrial fibrillation
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Consistent rate of atrial fibrillation diagnosis second 60 Electrical signals from ECG electrodes are collected with tested device and gold standard device. An automatic diagnosis of atrial fibrillation made with the tested device, and diagnosis of atrial fibrillation is made by the investigators with gold standard device. Diagnosis results include: "with atrial fibrillation (AF)", "without atrial fibrillation (No AF)", or "indecipherable".
After the diagnosis, the number of "with atrial fibrillation (AF)", "without atrial fibrillation (No AF)", or "indecipherable" cases measured by the two devices are calculated according to table 1, and then the results are evaluated for 3×3 matching consistency.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Sensitivity and specificity of the ECG App algorithm in detecting atrial fibrillation second 60 Sensitivity and specificity of the ECG App algorithm in detecting atrial fibrillation compared with physician-adjudicated Gold Standard ECG recorder. Per the protocol, only readable and classifiable (classifiable analysis set) paired recordings are included in the diagnostic performance assessment.
waveform qualitative assessment 1 second 60 1)The proportion of paired ECG strips appear to overlay to the unaided eye \> 0.80.
waveform qualitative assessment 2 second 60 2)The proportion of paired R-wave amplitude measurements within 2 mm of each other \> 0.80
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Shanghai Chest hospital
🇨🇳Shanghai, China