跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01029431
NCT01029431已完成3 期

Evaluation of the Intubating Laryngeal Airway in Children - Phase 2

University of British Columbia2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 90 人开始时间: 2009年12月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
3 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
90
试验地点
2
主要终点
Oropharyngeal leak pressure is the most commonly reported primary outcome measure of LMA performance. If fresh gas destined for the lung alveoli leaks around the LMA, inadequate ventilation may result, leading to respiratory acidosis.

研究概览

简要总结

The Air-Q® intubating laryngeal airway (Air-Q® ILA) is an extraglottic device specifically engineered for use both as a stand-alone laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and as a rescue device or "Plan B" device in the event of a difficult airway. As with some other types of LMA, it is then possible to insert an endotracheal tube (ETT) through the Air-Q® ILA, either blindly or mounted on a fibreoptic bronchoscope (FOB), to achieve endotracheal intubation. The objective of this study is to compare the Air-Q® ILA's performance to the current best option, the PLMA.

详细描述

Hypothesis: The hypothesis is that, for each of the four ILA size categories, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 & 2.5:

H0: Mean oropharyngeal leak pressure with Air-Q® ILA= mean oropharyngeal leak pressure with PLMA.

H1: Mean oropharyngeal leak pressure with Air-Q® ILA≠ mean oropharyngeal leak pressure with PLMA.

Background: The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is used during pediatric anesthesia for routine and difficult airway management. The ideal pediatric LMA device would provide excellent sealing at low pressure; facilitate easy endotracheal intubation; and be available in pediatric sizes. Such a device would be an invaluable addition to difficult pediatric airway management plans and, by increasing the likelihood of quickly and effectively securing the difficult airway, and decreasing the risk of catastrophic hypoxemia, would increase perioperative safety for children. The Air-Q® ILA is a modified LMA device whose features encompass the characteristics of the ideal LMA. Our objective is to determine whether or not this new airway device is an improvement over the current standard of care.

Specific Objectives:

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
— 至 16 Years(Child)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Eligibility Key inclusion and exclusion criteria Inclusion:
  • Ideal body weight as determined from weight/height centile curves (>3rd & <97th centiles).
  • Elective surgery
  • Appropriate subject and procedure for airway management by LMA sizes 1, 1.5, 2 or 2.5 (Weight 0-50 kg).

排除标准

  • ASA status IV-V
  • Emergency surgery
  • Abnormal or contraindicated cervical spine flexion/extension/rotation
  • Contraindication to LMA placement
  • Aspiration risk; gastro-oesophageal reflux disease
  • Clinically significant pulmonary disease
  • Coagulopathy
  • Distorted airway anatomy judged likely to compromise LMA placement
  • Allergy to any LMA components.

结局指标

主要结局

Oropharyngeal leak pressure is the most commonly reported primary outcome measure of LMA performance. If fresh gas destined for the lung alveoli leaks around the LMA, inadequate ventilation may result, leading to respiratory acidosis.

时间窗: 10 minutes

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Simon Whyte

Principle Investigator

University of British Columbia

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验