MedPath

Allis Clamp Versus Single-tooth Tenaculum

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
IUD
Registration Number
NCT05187078
Lead Sponsor
Brooke Andrews
Brief Summary

This study aims to determine whether an Allis clamp is an effective clamp for cervical stabilization compared to a single-tooth tenaculum.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
95
Inclusion Criteria
  • Obtaining IUD
Exclusion Criteria

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of patients who experienced bleeding after IUD placementAt the time of IUD insertion

Number of patients who experienced bleeding after IUD placement with an Allis clamp or single-tooth tenaculum.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time to hemostasisAt the time of IUD insertion

The time in seconds required to achieve hemostasis after IUD placement with an Allis clamp or single-tooth tenaculum.

IUD insertion success rateAt the time of IUD insertion

The percentage of participants who successfully had an IUD placed with an Allis clamp or single-tooth tenaculum.

Number of interventions required for cervical clamp site bleeding hemostasisAt the time of IUD insertion

Number of interventions required to achieve hemostasis after IUD placement with an Allis clamp or single-tooth tenaculum.

Participant reported painAt the time of IUD insertion

Pain reported by the participant (0-10 where a higher number indicates greater pain) at the time of IUD placement with n Allis clamp or single-tooth tenaculum.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Kentucky

🇺🇸

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

University of Kentucky
🇺🇸Lexington, Kentucky, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.