跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03984032
NCT03984032已完成不适用

Comparison of Clinical Performance of LMA Protector Cuff Pilot and LMA Supreme Among Anaesthetised, Non-Paralysed Patients

Liu Chian Yong1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2018年7月17日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
60
试验地点
1
主要终点
Oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP)

研究概览

简要总结

Comparison of clinical performance between LMA Protector Cuff Pilot and LMA Supreme in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure, time to insertion, ease of gastric tube insertion, laryngeal view, incidence of sore throat

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Patients planned for general anaesthesia without muscle relaxant usage via supraglottic airway device.

排除标准

  • •BMI > 35
  • •Patients with likelihood of difficult intubation (Simplified Airway Risk Index Score of 4 or more)
  • •Patients with increased risks of aspirations (gastrooesophageal reflux disease, obstetric patients, hiatus hernia)

研究组 & 干预措施

LMA Protector Cuff Pilot

Experimental

干预措施: LMA Supreme (Device)

LMA Supreme

Active Comparator

干预措施: LMA Protector Cuff Pilot (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP)

时间窗: During induction of anaesthesia

To assess the OLP of LMA Protector Cuff Pilot and LMA Supreme

次要结局

  • Mean time to insertion(During induction of anaesthesia)
  • Laryngeal view(After induction of anaesthesia)
  • Gastric tube insertion(After induction of anaesthesia)
  • Complications(24 hours)

研究者

发起方
Liu Chian Yong
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Liu Chian Yong

Consultant Anaesthesiologist

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验