ACTRN12615000783527已完成未知
Comparison of the LMA-Protector versus the LMA-Supreme on correct fit and positioning in surgical patients requiring LMA airway management.
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 100
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomised controlled trial
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Blinded (masking used)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 o limit（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •American Society of Anesthesiology physical status grade 1-3 and scheduled elective surgery under general anaesthesia.
排除标准
- •Patients who are pregnant, at risk of aspiration of gastric contents, requiring surgery in a position other than supine, undergoing head and neck surgery, or need endotracheal intubation.
研究者
相似试验
已完成
不适用
Comparison of performance of LMA Protector and LMA Proseal as airway management in anaesthetized paralyzed patientsCTRI/2022/02/040280il90
尚未招募
4 期
Comparison of two airway devices to see which is better to give anaesthesia in laparoscopic surgeriesCTRI/2024/02/063288Dr Aditi Suri
尚未招募
Unknown
COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT AIRWAY DEVICES AND ITS NATURECTRI/2023/03/050879Dr Madan
尚未招募
不适用
comparison between two types of supraglottic airway devices(LMA Protector and I-gel) regarding performance characteristics and ease of insertion in adult patients undergoing short duration of surgery under general anaesthesia.CTRI/2021/10/037397Dr Sirsanu Saha
尚未招募
4 期
MA protector vs LMA blockbuster in laparoscopic surgeries.CTRI/2024/07/071136Medical college baroda