Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2024/02/063288
CTRI/2024/02/063288
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4

Comparison of LMA ProSeal and LMA ProtectorTM as airway device in laparoscopic surgeries - a randomized controlled trial - nil

Dr Aditi Suri0 sites0 target enrollmentTBD

Overview

Phase
Phase 4
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Health Condition 1: K00-K95- Diseases of the digestive system
Sponsor
Dr Aditi Suri
Status
Not yet recruiting
Last Updated
2 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
TBD
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
2 years ago
Study Type
Interventional

Investigators

Sponsor
Dr Aditi Suri

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • ASA class 1 and 2
  • Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries
  • Duration of surgery less than 4 h
  • Expected blood loss less than 300 ml.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients who deny consent
  • Anticipated difficult airway
  • Increased risk of aspiration (Full stomach , hiatus hernia , gastroesophageal reflux disease)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Completed
Not Applicable
A comparison of the new laryngeal mask airway (LMA), LMA-Protector with the LMA-Supreme in surgical patients requiring airway management with an LMA.
ACTRN12615000783527Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital100
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of performance of LMA Protector and LMA Proseal as airway management in anaesthetized paralyzed patientsHealth Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: N813- Complete uterovaginal prolapseHealth Condition 3: K00-K95- Diseases of the digestive systemHealth Condition 4: C509- Malignant neoplasm of breast of unspecified siteHealth Condition 5: N838- Other noninflammatory disorders ofovary, fallopian tube and broad ligamentHealth Condition 6: H188- Other specified disorders of corneaHealth Condition 7: H748- Other specified disorders of middle ear and mastoid
CTRI/2022/02/040280il90
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
comparison between two types of supraglottic airway devices(LMA Protector and I-gel) regarding performance characteristics and ease of insertion in adult patients undergoing short duration of surgery under general anaesthesia.Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
CTRI/2021/10/037397Dr Sirsanu Saha
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT AIRWAY DEVICES AND ITS NATUREHealth Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
CTRI/2023/03/050879Dr Madan
Not yet recruiting
Phase 1
Comparison between Two supraglottic airway devices in anaesthetized patients on spontaneous ventilation during daycare proceduresventilation during daycare procedures
CTRI/2020/09/028146Department of Anaesthesiology