CTRI/2024/02/063288Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Comparison of LMA ProSeal and LMA ProtectorTM as airway device in laparoscopic surgeries - a randomized controlled trial - nil
Dr Aditi Suri0 sites0 target enrollmentStarted: TBDLast updated:
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Sponsor
Study Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •ASA class 1 and 2
- •Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries
- •Duration of surgery less than 4 h
- •Expected blood loss less than 300 ml.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients who deny consent
- •Anticipated difficult airway
- •Increased risk of aspiration (Full stomach , hiatus hernia , gastroesophageal reflux disease)
Investigators
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
A comparison of the new laryngeal mask airway (LMA), LMA-Protector with the LMA-Supreme in surgical patients requiring airway management with an LMA.ACTRN12615000783527Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital100
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of performance of LMA Protector and LMA Proseal as airway management in anaesthetized paralyzed patientsCTRI/2022/02/040280il90
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
comparison between two types of supraglottic airway devices(LMA Protector and I-gel) regarding performance characteristics and ease of insertion in adult patients undergoing short duration of surgery under general anaesthesia.CTRI/2021/10/037397Dr Sirsanu Saha
Not yet recruiting
Unknown
COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT AIRWAY DEVICES AND ITS NATURECTRI/2023/03/050879Dr Madan
Not yet recruiting
Phase 1
Comparison between Two supraglottic airway devices in anaesthetized patients on spontaneous ventilation during daycare proceduresventilation during daycare proceduresCTRI/2020/09/028146Department of Anaesthesiology