CTRI/2024/02/063288尚未招募4 期
Comparison of LMA ProSeal and LMA ProtectorTM as airway device in laparoscopic surgeries - a randomized controlled trial - nil
Dr Aditi Suri0 个研究点目标入组 0 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 4 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •ASA class 1 and 2
- •Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries
- •Duration of surgery less than 4 h
- •Expected blood loss less than 300 ml.
排除标准
- •Patients who deny consent
- •Anticipated difficult airway
- •Increased risk of aspiration (Full stomach , hiatus hernia , gastroesophageal reflux disease)
研究者
相似试验
已完成
不适用
A comparison of the new laryngeal mask airway (LMA), LMA-Protector with the LMA-Supreme in surgical patients requiring airway management with an LMA.ACTRN12615000783527Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital100
已完成
不适用
Comparison of performance of LMA Protector and LMA Proseal as airway management in anaesthetized paralyzed patientsCTRI/2022/02/040280il90
尚未招募
不适用
comparison between two types of supraglottic airway devices(LMA Protector and I-gel) regarding performance characteristics and ease of insertion in adult patients undergoing short duration of surgery under general anaesthesia.CTRI/2021/10/037397Dr Sirsanu Saha
尚未招募
Unknown
COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT AIRWAY DEVICES AND ITS NATURECTRI/2023/03/050879Dr Madan
尚未招募
1 期
Comparison between Two supraglottic airway devices in anaesthetized patients on spontaneous ventilation during daycare proceduresventilation during daycare proceduresCTRI/2020/09/028146Department of Anaesthesiology