CTRI/2022/02/040280已完成未知
Comparison of performance of LMA Protector and LMA Proseal in anaesthetized paralyzed patients
il0 个研究点目标入组 90 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 90
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •ASA- I to III undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia with airway management using supraglottic airway device in supine position.
排除标准
- •Patients with known difficult airway, edentulous, BMI > 30 kg/ m2, upper airway pathology,
- •mouth opening <3.2cm, known gastroesophageal reflux, increased risk of aspiration, recent
- •upper respiratory tract infection and patient refusal to participate, will be excluded from the
研究者
相似试验
已完成
不适用
A comparison of the new laryngeal mask airway (LMA), LMA-Protector with the LMA-Supreme in surgical patients requiring airway management with an LMA.ACTRN12615000783527Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital100
尚未招募
4 期
Comparison of two airway devices to see which is better to give anaesthesia in laparoscopic surgeriesCTRI/2024/02/063288Dr Aditi Suri
尚未招募
Unknown
COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT AIRWAY DEVICES AND ITS NATURECTRI/2023/03/050879Dr Madan
尚未招募
不适用
comparison between two types of supraglottic airway devices(LMA Protector and I-gel) regarding performance characteristics and ease of insertion in adult patients undergoing short duration of surgery under general anaesthesia.CTRI/2021/10/037397Dr Sirsanu Saha
尚未招募
2 期
A clinical Comparative study between efficiency of LMA-Supreme and I-Gel in adult patients undergoing elective surgeryCTRI/2024/06/069626RM Medical college