MedPath

Treatment of Mucosal Bolivian Leishmaniasis

Phase 3
Recruiting
Conditions
Mucosal Leishmaniasis
Registration Number
NCT04799236
Lead Sponsor
Fundacion Nacional de Dermatologia
Brief Summary

The purpose of this protocol is to conduct a randomized comparison of the efficacy and tolerance of miltefosine, LAMB, and pentavalent antimony for the treatment of mucosal leishmaniasis. With such controlled pharmacodynamic data, and additional considerations of administrative convenience (oral \>\>IV) and cost, we hope that it will be possible for policy makers, treatment professionals, and patients to choose the most appropriate therapy for ML.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
120
Inclusion Criteria
  • weight over 45 kg
  • Parasitological confirmation of the lesion will be made by visualization of Leishmania, culture of Leishmania, or molecular identification of Leishmania (PCR) from the biopsy or aspirate of the lesion.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Previous treatment for leishmaniasis in the last 12 months
  • concomitant diseases by history that would be likely in the PI's opinion to interact, either positively or negatively, with treatment
  • values of complete blood count, liver function (aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase), renal function (creatinine), pancreatic function (lipase), or uric acid beyond 1.5 x normal range
  • EKG with clinically significant abnormalities
  • Women of childbearing age not agreeing with the use of secure reproductive contraception for 4 months after initiating miltefosine therapy.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Healing of mucosal lesionsBaseline to 12 month follow up

The primary purpose is to perform a controlled evaluation of the cure rate of miltefosine, LAMB, and Sb for L braziliensis ML in Bolivia. Using a standarized scale we'll qualify from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) the following items: erythema, edema/swelling, infiltration, erosion/ulceration, in five different places: nasal and perinasal skin, nasal mucosa, palate and oral mucosa, pharynx and larynx. Additionally, changes in voice quality will be registered. 63 will be the maximun score and means severe and massive compromise.

clinical cure: \>90% loss of presenting severity score clinical improvement: 50%-90% loss of presenting severity score no clinical change: 25% worsening to 49% improvement in presenting severity score clinically worse: \>25% worsening of presenting score or relapse after initial improvement

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Clinical and laboratory safety of these 3 drugsBase line to 1 month after the end of therapy

The secondary purpose is to determine the tolerance of these regimens. Descriptive statistics will be used to present adverse event data. Continuous variables will be presented as number of observations (n), mean, standard deviation (SD), median, minimum and maximum values. Categorical variables will be presented as counts and percentages.

Adverse effects will be compared between groups by appropriate statistics. During treatment administration clinical symptoms (nausea/vomit/abdominal pain; myalgias/arthralgias; headache/dizziness) and laboratory (AST, alkaline phosphatase, lipase, creatinine, CBC) and EKG (in patients receiving antomony) will be evaluated.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hospital Dermatologico de Jorochito

🇧🇴

Santa Cruz de la Sierra, SC, Bolivia

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath