IRCT20230716058802N1招募中Unknown
Comparison of two methods of LMA insertion,Classic method and using a Laryngoscope.
Khoram-Abad University of Medical Sciences0 个研究点目标入组 106 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- Unknown
- 状态
- 招募中
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 106
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 years 至 65 years（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Elective surgery patients in Khorramabad Ashayer Hospital ,in 1402,
- •Patients with ASA class 1 and 2.
- •Patients with minor surgery.
- •Patients aged 18 to 65 years
- •Informed patients with written consent
排除标准
- •Patients with head and face injuries and head and neck abnormalities
- •Patients who have contraindications for LMA placement: such as high risk of aspiration, not fasting, pregnancy
- •Patients with difficult Airway
研究者
相似试验
尚未招募
2 期
THE STUDY OF INSERTION TECHNIQUES OF LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY- SUPREMECTRI/2020/12/029490Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Karad
尚未招募
不适用
Comparison of Classic-LMA vs I-gel Supraglottic Airway DeviceCTRI/2020/06/025683SMS Medical College Jaipur
进行中（未招募）
不适用
Passing device from either side of tongueCTRI/2018/01/011370A
尚未招募
3 期
To study and compare the two different devices-LMA BlockBuster and i-Gel used for airway patency during General Anaesthesia for surgery in ChildreCTRI/2024/03/064261Pt. BD Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak
已完成
不适用
Comparison of insertion characteristics of Proseal LMA with from head end versus foot endCTRI/2018/11/016281niversity College Of Medical Sciences50