CTRI/2020/12/029490尚未招募2 期
COMPARISON OF TWO INSERTION TECHNIQUES OF LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY- SUPREME
Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Karad0 个研究点目标入组 0 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 2 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •ASA Physical status 1-2
排除标准
- •1. patient refusal
- •2. patients with morboid obesity (BMI >40)
- •3. patients with cardiac disease
- •4. patients with systolic blood pressure <90mmhg
- •5. patients with pathologies of larynx and pharynx
研究者
相似试验
尚未招募
不适用
Comparison of three techniques of insertion of i-gel with respect to time of insertion, failure rate.CTRI/2018/12/016614Anaesthesia and Critical Care Department PGIMS Rohtak
招募中
Unknown
Comparison of two methods of Laryngeal Mask Airway insertion,Classic method and using a Laryngoscope.Comparison of two methods of LMA insertion,Classic method and using a Laryngoscope..IRCT20230716058802N1Khoram-Abad University of Medical Sciences106
招募中
不适用
TO STUDY THE COMPARISON OF THREE INSERTIONS TECHNIQUES FOR I-GEL PLACEMENT IN CHILDREN.CTRI/2022/11/047465ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES JODHPUR
进行中（未招募）
不适用
Passing device from either side of tongueCTRI/2018/01/011370A
尚未招募
4 期
REUSABLE LARYNGEAL TUBE SUCTION(LTS-II); STANDARD INSERTION TECHNIQUE VERSUS TWO MODIFIED INSERTION TECHNIQUES USING JAW THRUST TECHNIQUE AND MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPYCTRI/2016/08/007128I144